11-15-2004 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October IS, 2004 6:00 o’clock p.m. (Bill and Robia Grkrwn, Cootloord) except for a four by four foot landing, there *ould be 4.1 percent in the 0*75 ’ zone. Curtis stated the applicant is aware that Staff is recommending this change. Leslie inquired whether the 7.3 percent excludes the patio. Curtis stated the patio is included in the 7.3 pa cent. Curtis explained she subtracted the patio and the addition and added in a small landing for the dcor, w hich reduced it to 4.1 percent. Curtis stated she is recommending that option rather than the 7.8 percent hardcover being proposed by the applicant on the west side of the residence. Hansen stated on the side of the proposed additio i there is a jog there that ideally would work out aesthetically for the addition. Hansen stated the a iplicant is more than happy to remove all ihc rock and sacnfice the patio pavers m order to accomplish the addition Bremer noted this vsould reduce the hardcover amount to a number other than the 4 1 percent and the 7.8 percent. Curtis Slated it would be 4.5 percent. Hansen slated onginally in the 0-75* setback the hardcover was at 16 pacent. Bremer inquired w hat the hardcover would be in the 7.V-250* setback and what the hardship is for granting a variance. Han.sen slated the current garage is not very deep and is barely able to fit two cars. Hansen pointed out they arc not requesting a three-car garage. Grierson stated the previous owners at the time the additum was constructed located the furnace in the garage. Gnerson stated there currently is no place to put the furnace in the house. Grierson indicated the house is approximately 100 years old and has very little closet space. Griason stated if they are able to extend into the 0-75* setback, they could possibly use a portion of that for a utility room. Grierson indicated she would prefer having the furnace loc::ied in the house. Rahn inquired whether any hardcover is being added to the front. Gnerson indicated they are not increasing the hardcover in the front. Rahn commented his first inclination is to recommend the patio pavers be removed, which would give the applicant 347 square feet. Rahn suggested the applicants consider reducing the size of the rear addition. Rahn noted the garage is less than 20 feet deep and tite applicants do have some issues with storage. Rahn stated he feels there is somewhat of a hardship but that the proposed hardcov er exceeding 50 pacent is too excessive. Rahn mdicai.d he would prefer a redesign of the addition. PAGE 27