Laserfiche WebLink
MIMTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Moaday. October 18,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(#04*5024 City of Oroao, Vehicle Storage, Coaiiaard) <br />The Planning Commission and Staff have also looked at the advantages and disadvantages of granting <br />a vanance, a conditional use permit, a license, or permit to allow this type of use w ith the idea that no <br />new such conditions would occur but that the existing ones could continue as long as they meet the <br />permit conditions. Under Item f. minimum lot size of 5 acres, the following language has been added <br />••For any property at least 2 acres but le^s than 5 acres m area, where it can be showti that prior to the <br />effective date of this ordinance such a vehicle was previously stored on a regular basis pnor to and <br />after January I. 2004, a V'chiclc Storage Permit may be granted if the above conditions a through f. <br />are met. subject also to the following limitations; <br />1. A Vehicle Storage Permit may only be issued for proiKrtics within the RR-ID, RR-IA, and <br />LR-IA zoning districts. <br />2. Such i>ennii shall be granted only to the current property owner and only for the specific <br />vehicle applied for. The cunent owner ma\ replace the vehicle in kind, but shall not add other <br />such vehicles. Any replacement vehicle must be registered w iih the City w iihin 30 days to <br />transfer iis pemiittcd status. <br />3. This permit shall not apply to subsequent property owners. .Subsequent property owners shall <br />not be considered as having a grandfathered permit by virtue of their predecessor’s permit.” <br />Rahn called for public comments. <br />There wctc no public comments concerning this application. <br />Leslie inquired w hether StalT would be going through a re-permitting process periodically to <br />determine whether the projierty owner still owns that vehicle and is complying with the conditions. <br />Gaffron stated it was the intent of StalT to have a onc-time permit be issued without the need to ha\c it <br />be renew ed and to deal w ith any issues as complaints may arise. <br />Leslie asked whether it is SlaflTs preference not to have the permits renewed. <br />Gaffron stated he w ould prefer Staff not have to issue annual or three year permits. Gaffron stated <br />since there arc very few instances where this ordinance would apply that it probably would not be an <br />issue unless a neighbor has complaints, which would then be co\crcd under the nuisance section of the <br />ordinance. <br />Rahn noted this ordinance only applies to existing conditions. <br />Leslie inquired whether a person could discontinue this use and then re-apply for a permit after a <br />penod of ume. <br />Gaffron stated a clause could be added that says if the use is discontinued for a certain penod of time <br />that they no longer qualify for this type of permit. <br />PAGE 2