My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
10-18-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:22:53 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:18:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MM-3M2 SMntkayUfU <br />OcMbtr IS.M04 <br />ra|e7 <br />HaalPUt <br />Outlet E was created specifically for the Lofis,. ad needs to be final platted as a Lot i n order for it to be <br />used as abuilding site. The final platting process est^lishes the necessary perimeter drainage and utility <br />easements which were not required of it as an outlot The required wetland Conservation and Flowage <br />Easement was established during the earlier subdivision approvals, so that need not be required; however, <br />the wetlands should be shown on the new plat drawings. <br />This approval process is functionally approval of Phase 2 of the Stonebay residential development Plrase <br />2 final pi at approval will include payment of park fees, sewer and water connection ftes, and stomiwater <br />& drainage trunk fees established within Exhibit M of the PUD 4 Agreement. <br />Conclusion <br />A public hearinghas been scheduled for this proposal at your October IS meeting. Planning Commission <br />members are encouraged to identify for the benefit of staff and the developer any additional specific <br />concerns you believe need to be addressed with the site plan. Topics you should address in your <br />recommendation to Council include: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />Acceptability of building expansion and attachment (‘central core') and its visual impacts. <br />Acceptability of increased building height. <br />Acceptability of proposed building materials and building design. <br />Acceptability of location in relation to west lot line. <br />Signage (Ifproposed), building lighting, parking and landscape plans <br />Final plat. <br />Any other issues of interest or concern. <br />Staff Rccommcadation <br />IfPlanoingCommission concludes that the proposed revisions are acceptable, then a recommendation for <br />approval would be in order. If Planning Commission concludes that one or more of the above topics <br />luquires further consideration, then tabling would be appropriate.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.