Laserfiche WebLink
M04-3037 <br />Jul> 19.2004 <br />Pile 2 ofS <br />Sec 78-U34. Area restrictions In all R districts, no accessory building shall exceed <br />1,000 square feet of footprint area, except that accessory stracnires in excess of 1,000 <br />square feet \wll be allowed under the following conditions <br />(2) Oversized accessory structures are regulated by the following table <br />Lot .Arts (icrrs >j VliMmum I-.dividuil | <br />Accfijor) Siructure | <br />1 rcotp;int.V« <br />1 f7et) <br />MxvnLm Allowed To;a! ] <br />1 :f All AcceiJO') Stru:iure <br />Foerp-if. A.-J3J* on a <br />Pfcjerrv (ssji'e ftti’ <br />0--! S9 1 'TC'O : : cco <br />:C3-3 0C 1 i.:oo 2 4C0 <br />3Ci"J 50 , l 400 1: so; <br />J 51-4 CO j 1 tco , 1 :oc <br />4 01-4 50 1 1 SCO nico <br />4 51-5 CO :oco , 4o:o <br />1 5 01-6 i: ::o nio3 <br />1 6 01--’00 j 2 400 i 4.SCO <br />7 01-3 OC |:600 . 5 :oc <br />S O'.-9 00 1 2.S00 5 6CC* <br />! 9 01 or more i 3.000 ' 6.000 1 <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Applications <br />Exhibit B - Hardship Documentation Form <br />Exhibit r - Applicant's Nanatixes <br />Exhibit D - Survey <br />Exhibit E - Proposed Elevations <br />Exhibit F - Survey from Original Construction <br />Exlv.bit G - Survey Showing Addition at a 50’ Setback <br />Exhibit H - Aerial Photograph <br />Exhibit I - Property Owner’s List <br />Exhibit J - Plat Map <br />Background <br />Wav^zata Country Club applied for a conditional use permit amendraent in March of this <br />year in order to complete an addition and major renovation to the existing club building. <br />That CUP amendmeni was approved in late April as all standards of the Zoning <br />Ordmuuoe were met. <br />The Ground? Department of the Club is now requesting a variance to allow an addition to <br />be constructed to the existing maintenance building that cumently exists on the north side <br />of the Luce Line Trail. A variance was approved in 1988 to allow the existing building to <br />be oversized (over 1,000 square feci). That variance application and the building permit <br />indicated the building would be setback 55 ’ from the Luce Lxe Trail. The survey <br />submined for the proposed addition shows the building at a 45 ’ setback from the Luce <br />Line Trail. Therefore, tlte building was not constructed in its approved location in 1988- <br />1989