My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
06-21-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 12:40:13 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 12:35:43 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MM-Mlf <br />Junt 21, 2004 <br />PaScJofO <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />18.796 s.f (0.43 acres)Allowed: 2,819 s.f (15%) <br />Proposed: 2,702 s.f (14%) <br />Hardcover Calculariona <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />500-1000 <br />Total Arta in <br />Zone <br />18.796 s.f. <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />6.578.6 s.f. <br />(35%) <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Information not <br />provided_____ <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />5.370 s.f <br />(28.57%) <br />* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br />Lot arca/widlh variances <br />This property sits within a small lot neighborhood in a 2.0 acre zoning district. Many of <br />the lots on this street as well as Tonka Avenue have substandard let areas. Because this <br />property is less than a Vi acre, where 2.0 acres in normally reqiiired and has a defined <br />width of 150’ when 200’ is required, variances to area and width must be approved in <br />order for the applicant to construct a new residence. <br />Front and Side Yard Setback Variances <br />Because of the namre of the small lot neighborhood the applicant has proposed !4 acre <br />setback standards when the 2.0 acre setbacks are required. The applicant has proposed a <br />30.5’ front yard setback when 50’ is normally allowed under to 2.0 acre slandar^. The <br />applicant has also proposed a 49.4* north side yard setback and a 19.3* south side yard <br />setback when 30* is required under to 2.0 acre standards. This requires approval of front <br />and side (north and south) yard setback variances. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br />additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Analysis _______________________________________________ <br />In eoHsUtrinf mppttattiota for yariancf, tfie Piannhii Commitsion thaU consider the effect of the <br />proposed vorimmee t^on the heolth, sofety and welfare of the community, existing end mticipoted <br />ttoffk condMoms, tight end tie, danger of fire, risk to the pubtk safety, and the effect on values of <br />property In the surrounding area. The Hanning Commiulon shaU consider recommending approval <br />far variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Cede In Instances where their strict <br />enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual <br />property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such <br />actions will be In keeping with the spirit and Intent of rite Orono Zoning Code._____________ <br />Staff finds that a hardship exists with relationship to the lot area and lot width variance <br />requests. The lot was established prior to adoption of the Zoning Ordinance and is <br />thmfore a legal lot of record.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.