Laserfiche WebLink
r*: <br />L <br />o o <br />\ ‘V • *'45* <br />GITYofORONO <br />Munki|Ml OtTfccs <br />Street Addrest: <br />2750 de!!e? Partwiy <br />Oreno. US 5535S <br />Mailhi Address: <br />PO Bn 6S <br />CfytUi Bay. MN SS323 dOS6 <br />June IS. 2004 <br />Terry Dahlstrom <br />Dahlstioin Development IXC <br />7745 Polaris Lane <br />Maple Grove. MN 55311 <br />John Hassler <br />do John Terrance Homes <br />2500 Kelley Parku-ay <br />Long Lake. MN 55356 <br />Re; Stonebay To^^TJlomes <br />Gentlemen: <br />You may recall that just pnor to issuance of permits for construction of the iiutial StoneBay to\i«>tthomes last <br />September, you met with City staff at our request to discuss our concerns with the proposed exterior <br />treatments of the two townhome styles. Our primary concern was that the plans submitted for buildmg <br />permit approval were vastly different in exterior styling, appearance and quality as compared to the plans <br />diat were subnutted to gain development approval, especially vkith regard to the t\s o-story townhome plans. <br />When we met with you on September4,2003, you suggested to us that the reasons for the cl.anges were <br />related to your intent to provide a more casual, 'lakeshore home' feel rather than the more urban styling <br />of the original t>xo-story designs. Our response was that many of the exterior feauires provided in the <br />original renderings as pro\'iding a high quality appearance, were missing from the plans submined for <br />building permit approval. <br />At that meeting you suggested that the units would be equivalent in quality to other sirry priced <br />townhomes in the area, and you specifically directed us to the Charles Cudd development eu;.i oi highway <br />101 just north of Midway 55, as an example of something similar in quality. I visited that devebpment and <br />fbu^ that the units were quite attractive and contained a variety of a^tectural features that gave them a <br />high-qu^ty appearance. I somewhat reluctantly accepted your assertions that we would be satisfied with <br />the quality of your final product and your suggestion that if we were not, you w ould make it ri^t. <br />IUtphoM(952)24M6M • Fu (152) 24M4I4