My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
06-21-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 12:40:13 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 12:35:43 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONTDAY, MAY 17,2004 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(15. ••4-3017 SPRUCE HILL PROPERTIES. INC., CoaliHvcd) <br />Chair Mabusth pointed out the existing patio landing is cracked and suggested it be replaced. The applicants <br />indicated it is proposed to be replaced. <br />Chair Mabasth laoved, Kempf seconded, to rccomiiiead approval of Applicatioa M14-3017, Sprace Hill <br />Properties, to grant a hardcover variance to permit lets than 3.8% hardcover within the 0-75* zone <br />when 0% ta normally allowed aad 3.9% cnrreatly exists (removal of 7.5* x 2.5* chimaey shaft) and when <br />added to the 75*-250* mae alowaace yields total hardcover of less than 30% doe to the redaction in size <br />of the patio by abant 6*, to grant a lake setback variance to pcimii stnictnre within 75’ of the lake and <br />to grant a street yard setback variance to permit a 22* setback when 50* is normally required and 22* <br />currently exists. She commented that this is certainly a hardship lot. <br />Chair Mabusth asked for public comment. There were none. <br />VOTE; Ayes 7, .>ays 0. <br />Curtis advised the applicant to mark up the proposed patio removals on ihe application and provide ihc square <br />foouge measurements and return them to the City for inclusion in the approving resolution and site plan, and <br />that a new suney is not required. <br />16. ••4-3021 CITY OF ORO.NO. ZO.MNG CODE REVISIONS SECTIONS 78-72, 78-281, 78-282, <br />78-283-78-1279(6), 78-1405,78-1432, ALLOW ADMINISTRATI\ E APPROVALS AND REMO\X <br />DUPLICATE LANGUAGE, PUBLIC HEARING (11:51-11:54 p.m.) <br />Chair Mabusth moved, Leslie seconded, to rrconunend approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendments <br />fur Sectloas 78-1405 Entrance Monuments, 78-72 Administrative Approval. 78-282-300 Deirtrs <br />Duplicate Language. 78-1279 (6) Administrative Approval and 78-14342 Accessory Buildings. <br />Chair Mabusth asked for public comments. There were none, <br />VOTE; Ayes7.Na)sO. <br />PLANNING COM.MISSION CO.\t.\lE.*VrS <br />17. REPORT OF PLAN*NTNG COM3IISSION REPRFSFNTATIVFS ATTENDING CITY COUNCIL <br />.MEETINGS APRIL 25,2004 AND .MAY 10.2004. <br />Kempf reported on the May 10. 2004 City Council meeting he attended CialTron added that Big Island access <br />application w as approved and the MCWD is requ* ;ng filing of an easement declaration that is yet to be <br />determined. <br />Leslie reported on the April 26. 2004 City Council meeting, noting that the Valerius coffee house application <br />discussion emphasized the need for proof of hardship that was echoed by the Plarming Commission discussion <br />and recommendation. As a new Plannmg Commission member, he thought this was confirming to w hat the <br />Planning Commission’s goals are for granting hardship variances. <br />He explained the City Council action took out the parking spaces on the Valenus application. <br />Page 39 of 40
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.