Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY. MAY 17. 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(le. N»4-3009 JAMES A>D DARO' LOFKLER, Coattaacd) <br />Rahn tumman/cd the Planning Commission uas seeking a 1 5'o lot coverage by structure. mini;ni/?*ion of all <br />hardcover to the recommended standards of 3’ sidewalk. 8’dnveway. 8'x8‘ turnaround or whatever is <br />stipulated m the code for a tuma: ound on a county roadway Chair Mabusth asked for the standards to be <br />provided to the applicant. <br />Chair Mabusth asked for other comments. A public member. Henry Lamiarz. proposed consideration of <br />allowing a driveway with two hard surface tire Uacks to greatly minimize hardcover. Gaffron responded this <br />option has maintenance problems as dtKs driveway pavers and that property owners become unhappy with <br />them and pasx them os-er. resuhing in full coverage anyssay. Therefore, the City's hardcoscr ordinance d»>cs <br />not permit the option of stnps or pavers. <br />Leslie interjected that the stnps can be installed but will result in no reduction in the hardcover pcrcentaee <br />Chair Mabusth a^ked for further public comments, there were none <br />Chair Mabusth asked the applicants if they have received enough guidance to revise the proposal <br />Gaffron summarized that based on the surveyor’s measuienKmis received at the nM.*eiing. the lot coveia're by <br />structure is 2508 s.f and the direction is to minimi/e sidewalks and dnveways but is not able lo determine the <br />hardcover percentage at this time. <br />Gaffron indicated the application could be relumed to the Planning Commission on June 21.2004. and with a <br />Planning Commission recommendation, the matter could likely be scheduled for the June 28. 2004 City <br />Council meeting. <br />Hremer suggested the applicants should make the structure even .smaller to reduce lot coverage to less than <br />I S% to make an impact on the hardcover percentage. <br />Fritzler moved, Bremer seconded, to table Application 0O4-3OO9, J.-imes and Oarey l.»nier. 1690 <br />Sbady'wood Road, requesting a hardcover variance to construct a new residence on the properly, and <br />other variances for lot area and lot coverage bv structure. <br />VO I E: AvesT.N'av 0. <br />Chair Mabusth recessed the Planning Commission at 8:32 p.m. for a short break and reconvened at 8:44 p m. <br />1 1. #C4-30I2 R0<;ER D. O'SHAl GILNEJV.SY, 1265 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD. \ ARIANTES <br />AND tO.NDITlON.VL ISE PEK.M1T, PUBLIC llEARJNt; (8:44-9:37 p.m.I <br />Curtis explained the applicant’s requesi for three variances and two conditional use permits in order to <br />construct a boardwalk to the shore ending in .v landing, to cor.sttuct a wire mesh fence along Brackett’s Point <br />Road, to grade, fill and construct a retaining wall in the floodplain and to cons*.ruct chimney s 40’8 ” where 30’ <br />IS allowed. She noted there was change tn boardwalk width from 6' to 4’ boardwalk width, which will result <br />in a reduction in the hardcover pcrccniagcs from 550’ to 438 s f. yet to be confirmed. Curtis advised that the <br />city received two letters from neighbors that arc requested to be read into the record She pointed out the <br />Issues for Consideration outlined in the Suff Report, dated May 3. 2004. <br />C’uitis concluded by recommending the following <br />ApprovTil of the conditional use pemui to allow chimney heights of 40’ 8" where a 30’ ma.ximum is <br />normally allow cd. <br />Approval of the variance and conditional use permit for construction and fill w ithin the fioodplain <br />incorporating the recommendauons of the .MCWD and the City Engineer. <br />Denial of the hardcover vanance for 438 s.f. of hardcover within the 0-75* setback zone. <br />Denial of the variance to allow a fence within 75 ’ of the lake. <br />Page 23 of 40