Laserfiche WebLink
FiW i<M.3029 <br />July 19.2004 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Exhibit F - Hardcover Analysis <br />Exhibit G - Parking Analysis <br />Exhibit H - Section 78-71 Kon-Conforming Uses <br />Exhibit 1 - List of Permitted, Conditional & Accessory B - I Uses <br />Exhibit J - Denial Resolution from CUP Request 4-26-04 <br />Exhibit K - Photographs <br />Exhibit L - Property Owner's List <br />Exhibit M - Plat Map <br />Background <br />The applicant previously applied for a conditional use permit and commercial site plan <br />rc\ iew in early 2004 in order to convert tlie existing > acant garage stalls into a restaurant <br />with liquor use. That request was denied on 4-26-04 and the resolution is attached as <br />E.xhibit J. <br />The applicant is now proposing to construct a new entrance along the south wall of the <br />building Included with that request are plans to convert the existing vacant garage stalls <br />into a game room with a connection to the existing bowling alley The applicant has <br />stated that serv ing liquor is not part of this proposal. The new entrance is proposed at 16* <br />X 132* or 2,026 square feet (minus existing bump out). Several doors are proposed from <br />the entrance to the proposed game room, existing bowling alley, and lounge area known <br />as The Crib. The applicant has proposed to remove the existing wall of the western 88’ <br />of the proposed entrance and install beams to support the upper level This new space <br />will provide area for coats, shoes, and potentially lockers and be open to the existing <br />bowling alley and lounge area. It is unclear if the existing lounge will be maintained <br />under this new use or if the wall separating it from the bow ling alley will be removed <br />The applicant is also proposing to construct a new staircase connecting the upper level <br />parking lot to the lower level parking lot. This staircase is proposed to replace the <br />existing staircase that runs along the eastern building wall. The applicant will replace the <br />existing retaining walls at a later date, which will not require a building permit as they do <br />not exceed 4 feet in height and will be constructed in the same location as the existing <br />retaining wall system. Because the reuining walls do not require a building permit they <br />have not been included in this commercial site plan review. <br />Issues for Discussion <br />There arc a number of issues w ith the application beyond structural coverage, parking <br />and hardcover. These issues pertain specifically to the uses existing and proposed and <br />whether those uses are pemiitted under the current Zoning Ordinance. The structural <br />coverage and hardcover requirements should weigh in on any decisions of what should be <br />permitted on site, however, the Planning Commission and Council should detennine <br />whether the uses should be permitted first and foremost. The following must be <br />considered when determining what uses should be allowed: <br />1. The bowling alley is currently a legal non-conforming use. The Code of 1968 <br />listed a bowling dley as a permined use and Navarre Lanes w*as created during