My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
04-19-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:42:11 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:34:17 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
»04-!974 Sioncba) Markriplacr <br />April IS. 2004 <br />rafc4 <br />2. Conformity to B-61*UD Standards <br />A. Allowed Uses Basc<ionacompilaiionoftheaI]o\vablcuscsinthcB*l and B-6 Districts, <br />Planning Commission has produced a list of permitted and conditional uses that would be <br />appropriate for this site as part of the PUD rezoning process. The list is attached as Exhibit F. The <br />proposed buildings and site lasoui would reasonably accommodate many of the indi\ idual uses on <br />the proposed list of allow able uses. Planning Commission should again review the list to ensure <br />it reflects your intent for this sue <br />B. Lot Area A tfidih. Required area and width for B-6 are 2.0 acres and 100*. The proposed <br />preliminaryplatcieates two lots Lot 1 = 1.98 acres 370 ’. and Lot 2= 1.71 acres and 135’. Both <br />lots arc slightly undersized in area, how ev cr, the sue at 3 69 acres is limited by ha% mg no additional <br />land available Staff recommends approval of the lot area and widths as proposed. <br />C. Setbacks . Setback requirements and conformity are show n in the follow ing tabic Note that <br />for litis PLID rezoning and use conversion, staff early on cstablislicd setback requirements at 35 ’ <br />for buildings and 20’ for parking, based on the B-1 retail standards w Inch are more appropriate <br />than the B-6 office standards for the proposed retail uses. <br />Required Setbacks Front (south)Side Interior Side Street Rear (north) <br />West Building <br />Lot 1 <br />RiSwnI Mrvalrta lusal'nl riafiwe <br />35*85'>A NA (w)35'(w) 20 *35'42' <br />East Building <br />Lot 1 <br />.■«$•125*to*40'NA NA 35-4»* <br />Walgreens <br />Lot 2 <br />35*itr 10'40'35'40*35-42' <br />Parking* Loti 20*20'5'O'*NA NA 20'20’ <br />Parking' Lot 2 20'20*S'0"20'20'.32*20'20' <br />'Includes drhing lanes <br />’This O' selbark Is a runcllon ot ihe shared driveway syslem <br />’SlatTsupports a 20'Mesl side setback for ihe weMerly building. The alternalivr would be to reduce the oserall <br />length of buildings on Lot I. <br />D. SiteDramaee . The applicants have pro\ ided a drainage plan that includes catch basins and <br />storm sew ers discharging to the adjacent regional pond. Approval is subject to City Engineer <br />review and acceptance of the proposed plans.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.