Laserfiche WebLink
•04-2974 SUMb«7 MariutplM <br />F<bnuryl3.2004 <br />P>ge2«44 <br />List Of Exhibits <br />A • Revt&ed Site Plans: <br />Version 14 (North lot is retail) <br />Version 15 (North lot is bank) <br />B - February 5. 2004 Transmittal Letter from John Trautt <br />C - Februao' 2, 2004 Letter from John Hassler of John Terrance Homes <br />D - Nonce of Planning Commission Action 1-26-04 <br />E • Notice of 60-Day Extension 2-13-04 <br />F - Submittal - Hours of Operation. Number of Employees <br />Q - Lists of B-l and B-6 Allowed Uses <br />H - Memo and Exhibits of 1-16-04 <br />Status or Review Process <br />This item was initially presented for Pl«muii£ Commission review and a public hearing a: the January 20 <br />regular PC meeting. The applicants hao :<>iade presentations to the Planning Commissi on on January <br />7 and February 11. Staff has tci with 'be applicants on multiple occasions to discuss the site planning <br />aspects ofihe proposal, most Tceii. ; 2. including the City Engineers Tom Kellogg (general <br />site engireering) and Shelly Joh. , as well as Planning Consultant Phil Carlson. <br />From the perspective of site circulation uiOt layout the numerous revisions to date have resulted in a plan <br />that is nearing acceptability for the proposed uses and sizes/shapes of buildings. I loue ver. Planning <br />Commission on January 20 expressed concerns about the fundamental issue of revising the Comprehensive <br />Plan to allow for retail as the primary use of Outlot A. rather than the current CMP guideplan sums of retail <br />only as ancillary to a primary ofTice use of the site. To allow for additional discussion of this issue, Council <br />members were invited to attend the February 11 work session. <br />Three of the four facets of the application are subject to the 60-day review peiiod established by statute. <br />The review penod expiration date has been extended (See Exhibit E) an additional 60 days to Apnl 1S. <br />2(X)4. based on the tabling by Planning Commission and the anticipated future meeting schedule. Planning <br />Commission docs need to reach a conclusion regarding a teco.mmendation on the Comp Plan Amendment, <br />Rezoningand Commercial Site Plan Review issues within a ume frame that allow s for Council action to <br />approve or deny the proposal.