03-15-2004 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MEMORANDUM Mayor Pclcrson and City Council Chair Smith and Planning Commission Ron Moorse, City Adnunistrator From: Date: Mike Gaffron, Planning Director March 4.2004 Subject: Latest Information re: Stonebay Marlcetplace Attachinenti 1 • Staff letter to John Trautz dated March 1. including conceptual sketch 2 - Trautz response leuer dated March 3,2004 3 • Revised Site Plan #17 (Most current applicant submittal) 4 - City Engineer corrunenu dated March 2. 2004 re Plan #17 As a result of two Planning Cotrunission heatings, at least two work sessions and a number of discussions with the applicants, staff has concluded that the applicants have not been focusmg adequately on the issues we feel are important to allow conversion of this site from primanly office to ptimanly retail uses. Over the past 3 rmnths we have seen many tweaks to the initial site plan, but virtually no changes in the iruensity of use or the orientation of uses. It seemed appropnate to send a letter that nukes clear exactly what we am thinking (Attachment 1). The response letter from Mr. Trautz (Anachment 2) is attached, as is the most recent site plan (Version 17) and the most recent comments from the City Engineer as to parking and circulation in that plan. On February 17 the Planning Commission tabled all elements of the application (Comp Plan Amendment - Rezoning- Subdivision - Commercial Site Plan Review) to its March 1S meeting, with the intent in the interim to meet with the Long Lake Planning Commission to discuss the topic of development along Highway 12 and hopefully gam a sense of whether Long Lake would see the conversion of this site to reuul as a positive or negative impact on their ability to implement Long Lake’s downtown master plan. That meeting was held last night with a majority of each planning commission in attendance. It was a cordial meeting, and I think both commissions have a better understanding of each others intents and concerns regarding development. My sense is that a majority of the Long Lake people in attendance are concerned that implementation of their plan will be difficult and take some time to accomplish, and that any retail we do at the west end of town will not make it any easier for their plan to move forward. They seemed quite supportive of our actions to date in not allowing retail west of Willow. 1 will be asking the Planning Commission at its March 1S meeting to make a formal rKomniendaaon to the Council regarding the (Tomp Plan Amendirunt, and if the recommendation is m favor of the amendment, to ccnfirm that die goals laid out in the March I letter to the applicant should be incorporated into language to be added to the Comp Plan for development of this specific site.