My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-15-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
03-15-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:30:22 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:22:25 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
443
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#04>2974 StMtbay Markitplact <br />M*rcH12.2M4 <br />PtCt2 <br />List ofExhlbits <br />A • March 4,2004 Suft Memorandum to Planning Commission and CouiKil <br />B • March 1,2004 SufT Letter to Applicant <br />C • March 3,2004 Letter from Applicant <br />D • Revised Site Plan #tl7 <br />E - March 2,2004 City Engineer Comments re Site Plan «I7 <br />F • February 17,2004 Staff Memo: Supplementary Comments <br />G • Compilation of Appropriate Uses from February 17 Discussions <br />H • February 13.2004 Staff Memo and Selected Exhibits <br />I-Draft PC Minutes 2-17-04 <br />DU cuss Iob <br />Staffbelieves this site can be planned in such a way as to ptoside the types of uses and amenities needed <br />to enhance the surrounding neighborhood as a walkable, somewhat self-containod. mixed-use mini-village. <br />Staff supports the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the rezoning to B-6 PUD, subject to the <br />parameters and goals delineated in the March 1 letter to the applicant. These concepts would be <br />incorporated into the text of the CMP as requirements for development of the site. <br />IfPIanning Commission agrees with the comments and principles of the March I letter, there is no point <br />in going ahead with a detailed review of the current site plan until a substantially revised plan is submitted. <br />Planning Commission should reach a conclusion on the Comp Plan Amendment before proceeding with <br />its site plan review. <br />As noted at your February meeting, the rezoning goes hand in hand with the Comp Plan Amendment, and <br />canprovideforagreaterlevelofdetailthanthePlan. PlanningCommission identifiedaspeciftc list of <br />allowable or unacceptable uses for the site in February, and these will be incorporated into the PUD <br />rezoning for this site. The PUD approval for this site becomes the governing ordirumce for the property, <br />and should be carefully crafted to ensure that only appropriate uses are allowed under appropriate <br />conditiotu. <br />Finally, note that PlanningCommission must make a recommendation on the Comp Plan Amendnkntat your <br />March 15 meeting, in order to conform with the statutory 120-day review period, which ends April 15 (prior <br />to your next meeting).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.