Laserfiche WebLink
Ftt.EfO«-2962 <br />27 Fibruaty 2004 <br />Pag* 4 of 4 <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. If Planning Commission concludes that a haxdship exists, they should discuss a <br />reasonable square footage and whether the deck should be required to meet the 73* <br />setback. <br />2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Department staff recommends denial of the after-the-fact variances as <br />requested. The applicant rhould be allowed to construct a small landing for safety <br />purposes. <br />However, should the Planning Commission find a hardship to allow the after-the-fact <br />hardcover variance. Planning Staff recommends removal of the portion of the deck <br />extending into the 73* lake setback. <br />j