Laserfiche WebLink
FILEM4-29B2 <br />27 February 2004 <br />Pag* 3 of 4 <br />Structural Covtr>gct <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />10.700 s.f. (0.24 acre)Allowed; 1.605 s.f. (15 V») <br />Proposed: 1.628 s f. (15.2 */o) <br />Hardcover Calculations; <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />Total Area in <br />Zone <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />5.245 s.f.Os.f 60 s.f 60 s.f. <br />0-75 (0%)(l.l4»/o)(1.14 «/o) <br />75-250 5.455 s f.1,363 7 s.f <br />(25*/.) <br />2,356 s.f.* <br />(43 2*/c) <br />2.356 s.f. <br />(43 2 %) <br />After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br />Lake Setback Variance <br />The newly constructed deck is 14.5'x 12*. The deck extends 5’ into the required 75’ lake <br />setback. The portion of the deck located within the lake setback is 5’xl2 ’ (60 s.f). <br />Hardcover Variance <br />Currently the property has 43.1 “/o hardcover within the 75'-250' zone where 25®/a is <br />allowed. The deck accounts for 2. l®/o of the hardcover within this zone where previously <br />there was no hardcover. <br />Within the 0-75 ’ zone there is a toul of 60 s f. of hardcover where nortc is allowed. The <br />deck accounts for all of this hardcover (1 .14®/o). <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicants have completed the Hardship Documentation Form (Exhibit B). and should be <br />asked for additional testimony rega.'ding their application <br />Hardship Analysis <br />tm considering mpplkatlons for wiance, the i'iannUig Commission thail consider the effect of the <br />proposed vorianee upon the he iith, safety and welfare of the community. exiiilng and anticipated traffic <br />( ditioHS, light and air, danger offire, risk to the public tafety, and the effect on values of property in <br />me surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances <br />from the llteraJ provisions of the Zoning Code bi btuances where their strict enforcement would rause <br />undue hardship becruse of circumstances unique to the Individual property under comlderatiun, and <br />sh til recommend approval only when It is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the <br />spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />Staff ftnds that, absent the documentation of the old deck, there is no hardship for the size <br />or location of the new deck.