My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-17-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
02-17-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:14:32 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:06:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r MM-2f74 StOMlMyMirkctpbce <br />FtbnurylS.2004 <br />Pifi4or« <br />3. The Waigreen's service area (trash enclosure, loailing dock area, etc) on the west side of the <br />building has been provided with beefed screening as compared to earlier plans. Use of primarily <br />coniferous trees in this area would allow for substantial winter screening. <br />4. The coffee shop drive-thru at the west end of the retail building still can be improved. Staff would <br />recommend the following: <br />A) Eliminate the inbound (southbound) lane at the west end of the site. Have the westerly <br />Kelley Parkway access point as 'out only'. Ingress from this location has linle value to the <br />overall site circulation. <br />B) This will then leave approximately 12'of additional space in which the exit from the dnve- <br />thru can be extended to a 90-degree angle, allowing drive-thru traffic to exit north rather <br />than south. It may also be necessary to reduce the length of the building by 1 S'-18' to <br />accomplish this. However.staff is quiteconcemedaboutthecunentla>out pointing drive- <br />thru exiters into an oncoming lane at a 45-degree angle. <br />C) The removal of the southbound lane also will allow for additional green space and patio <br />space at the west end of the building overlooking the pond area.. <br />5. In general, save for the above comments, site access and circulation has been refined to a point that <br />staff is generally satisfied with the current plans. Pedestrian access has also been revised to provide <br />for reasonable and safe access and circulation throughout the site. Minor refinements may >et occur <br />with the suggested traffic circulation changes. <br />6- Required Parking. The two current plans differ slightly in parking requirements: <br />• Plan 14 (retail on north site) requites a total of 172 stalls per Orono code, and 146 are <br />provided, a shortage of 26 stalls. <br />- Plan 15 (bank on north site) also requires a total of 172 stalls, but only 140 air provided. <br />The plan reviewed by Planning Commission in January required 172 stalls and provided 167, a <br />shortage of only 5 stalls. City Traffic Consultant Sheldon Johnson will be asked to comment on <br />the need for the full complement of parking. <br />7. IJghting. Signage. Planning Commission should review again the site signage plan (Sheets A5.1 <br />andSN-1 of the January 16 memo) and determine whether it needs further refinement. Also <br />review the building signage as depicted on the elevation views and in Sheet C2.2. It would be <br />staff s intent that adefined signage criteria document be drafted to regulate ongoing signage on the <br />site.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.