Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
Hardcover Catculationi! <br />•04-2*70 <br />Jannary 20.200i) <br />Pag(4or7 <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />Total Area in <br />Zone <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Eiisting <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />0-75 9.180 s.f.Os.f <br />(0*/i) <br />0 s.f <br />(0*.) <br />Osf <br />(0*/i) <br />75 - 250 21.060 s.f.5.265 s.f <br />(25%) <br />5.965 s.f* <br />(28%) <br />5.785 s.f <br />(27%) <br />250-500 15.160 s.f.4.548 s.f <br />(30®/o) <br />2.960 s.f* <br />(19 5«/o) <br />2.960 s.f <br />(19 5%) <br />Side Yard Setback V'ariance <br />The applicant is proposing to change a flat roof to a pitched roof, including raising the <br />ceiling, at the southeastern comer of the home. The height increase, from the top of the <br />current roof to the pitch of the new roof, will be approxirr.atcK 11 *. The current setback <br />in this location is 18 ’ when 30’ is required by the Zoning District. No footprint <br />expansion is proposed <br />Average Lakeshore Setback N'ariancc <br />The applicant’s home was constructed in 1950 in the locahon indicated on the surxey. <br />All City records indicate that the home all City codes in ericct at that time. Because the <br />proposal involves additional structure, and the home no longer meets the avciage <br />lakeshore setback of approximately 1 80’. a \-ariance is recurred <br />Hardcover \‘ariance <br />The proposed roof change will not increase hardcover on the property, however the <br />proposed car port will move around the hardcover somewhat. The existing property <br />meets hardcover requirements in the 0-75' and 250-500’ zones, but is non-conforming in <br />the 75-250’ zone where 28^i (5.965 s.f.) currently exists causing the need for a hardcover <br />variance. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicant has provided a bnef hardship statement in E.xhirit B. and should be asked for <br />additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Anaivsis <br />/if coHiUtfing tppUemtioHi/or wiance, the Planning Commauon %hntt eontUer the effect of the <br />ptopoied variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the conununin, etisting and anticipated <br />traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of <br />property In the surrounding area, ne Planning ConunLulon shaU consider recommending approval <br />for variances from the Uur^ provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their Uriel <br />enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the Individual <br />property under consideration, and shall recommend approval onh when It Is demonstrated that such <br />actions will be in keeping with the spirit and Intent of the Orono Zoning Code.