Laserfiche WebLink
F1UEM3-2923 <br />Cctce«r9.2003 <br />Pag* 5 of 6 <br />occupied by a building.** The frontage is 250* along Shoreline Drive, allo%^ing the <br />property 250 s.f. of signage. Additionally, no individual sign may exceed 50 s.f.. A new <br />pole sign is proposed at 83 s.f. and wall signs totaling 67 s.f.. The property is allowed <br />signage up to 250 s.f. The proposed signage of 150 s.f. is in compliance with Zoning <br />Ordinance requirements. <br />Landscaping Plan <br />The applicant has proposed additional vegetative screening between the west side of the <br />proposed building and the western drive. The western property line is screened with a <br />buffer of trees over 6 ’ tall. The Planning Commission should discuss w hether the <br />proposed and existing vegetation is adequate for screening the outdoor storage in the <br />western parking/storage lot. <br />yghiiag <br />A lighting plan has not been provided with the application. The applicant should address <br />how or whether the individual buildings, entr>’ways. or parking lot will be illuminated. <br />Building Quality and Materials <br />The attached sheets labeled A1-A5 depict the floor plans and elev ations for the proposed <br />building. The approved exterior wall finishes as designated by City Code must be face <br />brick, natural stone, specially designed precast concrete units, factory fabricated and <br />finished metal framed panel construction, or other materials as may be approv ed by the <br />Council. Combinations of such materials shall be permitted The applicant has proposed <br />vertical wood siding with a field stone base for the exterior facade of the building. The <br />Planning Commission should discuss whether these “residemiar* materials are <br />appropriate for the B-l district. <br />Summary of biues for discussion: <br />1 . Is the outdoor storage use non-conforming? Should it be allowed to be improved <br />and/or expanded? <br />2. Should the building be constructed to accommodate all of the equipment storage for <br />the business, including the equipment currently being stored outdoors? <br />3. Should one or both of the accessory' structures be removed? <br />4. Should, if permitted to remain, the outdoor storage be restricted to a specific amount, <br />type and location of equipment? Should additional screening be installed? <br />The west and south lots on the property are gravel. Is grav el an appropriate parking <br />surface for a business district? Should all of the lots be provided with curb and <br />gutter?