My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-20-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
01-20-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 11:15:37 AM
Creation date
1/26/2023 11:06:01 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
520
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hardcover Calcalalioos <br />M4-2M9 <br />laiaary 30.2MM <br />PagcCafl <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />Toul Area in Allow ed <br />Zone Hardcover <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />0-75 7.760 ..r 860 s.f* <br />(11.08%) <br />653 s.f <br />(8.41%) <br />75-250 15 ‘^OOsf 3.800 s.fI3..WS.I.6.149 s.f* <br />(40.45%) <br />5.321 s f <br />(35*/o) <br />Lol Area Variance <br />Due to the extent of the proposed improvements, the project is being reviewed as a <br />rebuild. The lot is 0.527 acres in size when 1 acre is required by Zoning Ordinance. <br />Therefore, a lot area \oriance is required to allow the applicant to construct a new <br />residence. <br />Side Yard Setback \'ariancc <br />The applicant is proposing two large additions in addition to a complete renovation of the <br />existing footprint. Included in this proposal is a screened porch with an attached, second <br />story deck. The porch meets the 10* setback, however, the deck is proposed at an 8* <br />setback requiring a side yard se'J^ack variance. <br />Hardcover Variance <br />As stated earlier in this report, the applicant is proposing two large additions and a <br />complete renovation of the existing footprint. Because of the extent of the work being <br />done the project is being reviewed as a rebuild. This is specifically pointed out because <br />the proposal is subject to the same sundards with regard to hardcover, which rebuilds <br />have consistently been held to. <br />75-250'ZOSE <br />The existing hardcover in the 75-250* zone is 40.45% or 6,149 s.f. *I*he applicant is <br />proposing to tear down the detached garage that sits on the street property boundary , add <br />two large additions to the existing footprint, add two decks, reduce the existing driveway <br />by 1,379 s.f, construct a 92 s.f. stoop and to keep the existing keystone walls and steps. <br />This brings the proposed hardcover to 35% (5.321 s.f.), well below the existing hardcover <br />but still requiring a variance. <br />0-75'ZOSE <br />The applicant is also proposing a variance for the 0-75* zone. Currently, a large railroad <br />tie retaining wall, concrete stair sy sie.-n. and railroad tie stairs comprise 11% hardcover in <br />the 0-75* zone. The applicant is proposing to keep both sets of suirs and replace the <br />railroad tic retaining wall with a bou!der out-crop, which reduces the hardcover to 8.41%, <br />requiring a variance. <br />CoBditional Use Permit <br />According to Section 78-1286 c: the Zoning Ordinance any earth moving work In the 0- <br />75* zone requires approval of a condiuonal use permit. The intent of this ordinance is to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.