Laserfiche WebLink
^^NUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, September 20, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(#04-3052 Eric Vogstrom, Continued) <br />Barbara Essen, 2648 Casco Point Road, stated they have spoken with the applicant regarding the issue <br />of drainage and that the applicant has indicated he is more than willing to ensure that drainage from thi'j <br />lot will not affect their lot. <br />Jeff Essen stated the first plan did not show a swale, with the recent plan showing a swale. Essen stated <br />the applicant has also indicated he would be installing gutters and downspouts, which would also help to <br />alleviate their concerns regarding runoff <br />Barbara Essen stated they are not opposed to the larger dnveway since parking along Casco Point Road <br />is a problem at times. Essen indicated the applicant has also expressed a willingness to preserve the <br />nicer trees on this lot, noting that a number of larger trees were lost as a result of a storm in 1997. <br />Vogstrom stated the preservation of the trees is also one reason why he would like to have approval of <br />the 10-foot encroachinent into the right-of-way. Vogstrom stated the majority of the trees are located on <br />the south side of the lot. <br />Alan Greene, 2645 Casco Point Road, stated he is located across the street from this lot, and that in his <br />opinion the proposed hardcover for this lot is excessive. Greene stated his residence is approximately <br />1200 square feet on a lot that is approximately the same size and that the lot in question is being <br />overbuilt. <br />Vogstrom stated Greene’s footprint is 1374 square feet and his garage is 695, for a total footprint of <br />over 2,000 square feet. <br />Fritzlcr stated he docs not see the need for the 57.9 percent where 25 pciccnt is allowed and 26.4 <br />percent currently exists. Fritzler stated he does not see the hardship for the it.crease in the hardcover. <br />Fritzler stated he is also opposed to the 10-foot setback, <br />Bremer inquired what number Fritzler would like to see for this lot given its 'cstrictions. <br />Fritzlcr stated he would be willing to approve 27 percent hardcover for this lot, but that he does not see <br />any justification for the additional hardcover or encroachment. <br />Kempf stated he is in agreement with Fritzler and that the plan appears to have been laid out without <br />any consideration for the hardcover restnctions Kempf mquircd whether the applicant would be adding <br />a deck or patio in the future. <br />Vogstrom stated a deck is included in his current plans and that he docs not intend to add a patio in the <br />future. <br />Bremer indicated she feels the 27 percent is low given the restrictions of this lot. <br />Rahn commented he also feels this is a hardship lot but that it docs not justifs- the 57.9 percent <br />hardcover being proposed. Rahn stated m his vnew more effort needs to be made *.o reduce the <br />hardcover and that the structure could also be reduced to eliminate the need for the side street setback <br />vanancc. <br />PAGE 22 <br />« ^ * ' • 4 V «• Jim ^ >