Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MLNUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNLNG COM^HSSION MEETING <br />Monday, September 20,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(#04-3052 Eric Vogstrom, Continued) <br />from the building site by an inlet of Carman Bay. The contiguous land area is approximately 16,400 <br />square feet. The applicant is basing the strucb.ral coverage amount on the total noncontiguous parcel <br />above the 929.4’ elevation. Neither the lot coverage ordinance nor the Zoning Code definition of <br />“lot area” clanfy whether the lot coverage percentage should be based on contiguous area. The <br />definition of minimum lot area found in the Subdivision Code would disallow noncontiguous land to be <br />credited toward lot area. <br />Curtis stated the applicant is proposing a 3,002 square foot footprint, 1,225 square feet of driveway, and <br />215 square feet of sidewalk to make up the 57.9 percent hardcover. There are no patios proposed and <br />only one 18 ’ by 1 1 ’ deck on the lakeside of the home. Curtis noted the driveway as proposed would <br />need to be reduced at the curb and would need to be substantially reduced overall to bring the hardcover <br />down to a reasonable level <br />Staff finds that there is no hardship mhcrent to the land that would justify the side street setback <br />variance or the hardcover variance as proposed. Staff believes that the 55-foot wide building envelope <br />is very reasonable and that a setback variance to the side street is not justified. If the Planning <br />Commission concludes that the applicant should get credit toward the structural coverage for the dry <br />land on the noncontiguous portion of the property, there may be some appropriate level of hardcover <br />variance to support some reasonable level of development of the site. <br />Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance and recommends denial of the <br />side street setback variance and denial of the hardcover variance. Staff also recommends removal of the <br />existing gravel driveway within the city right-of-way and restoration of the area back to vegetation as <br />part of the redevelopment of this lot. Curtis noted the grading and drainage plans have been revised <br />since the issuance of the letter by the City Engineer, and that the applicant has addressed the grading <br />and drainage concerns that have been raised. <br />Vogstrom noted the road is unimproved to the north and requested the Planning Commission allow the <br />encroachment in the right-of-way. Vogstrom stated the existing structure encroaches into the <br />right-of-way by 14 feet. <br />Vogstrom explained the existing hardcover calculation docs not include anything for a pad and <br />driveway, which exists on the north side. Vogstrom indicated at the present time there is no way to <br />access the garage without going over the right of-way. Vogstrom noted the current structure is located <br />21.8 feet away from the street and is nonconforming. Vogstrom indicated he would be willing to restore <br />the right-of-way at his expense if the city is willing to work w ith him on the hardcover. <br />Vogstrom stated in his opinion he has a hardship due to the amount of water on his property and the fact <br />that his land is not contiguous. Vogstrom stated in his opinion the proposed residence coafonns more <br />with the rest of the neighborhood than what currently exists. <br />Vogstrom noted the property at 2601 Lafaycne Road was granted hardcover in excess of 25 percent. <br />Vogstrom stated the current structure is 1184 square feet and is figured at 26.4 percent hardcover. <br />PAGE 21 <br />I.