My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
11-22-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 3:39:26 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 2:21:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
361
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Receiicd: 08-18-04 <br />Date Application Complete: 09-13-04 <br />60-Day Review Period Extended: 01-13-05 <br />^^11• I ti • <br />NUV c. c 2‘JU4 <br />CU f Ur unui>fO <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Diilc:November 17, 2004 <br />Item No. ^ <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Melanie Curtis <br />Title: City Planner * <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Item Description: <br />1/04-3052 - Uric Vogstrom - 2618 Casco Point Road - Variances <br />S^ning District: <br />Lot Area. <br />Lot Width: <br />LR-IC, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 0.5 acrc/100' <br />0.47 acrc/20,561 s.f. <br />100’ parallel to the shore & 80’ @ 75’ setback <br />List of Esbihits: <br />A - PC Action Notice dated 11-17-04 <br />B - PC Memo & Hxhibits of 11-10-04 <br />C - Letter from Mawkins Tree & Laiulscaping dated 11 -8-04 <br />D - Drafl Minutes from 11-15-04 <br />Application Summary: <br />The applicant is proposing 36.8% hardcover within the 75’-250’ zone and an average lakeshore <br />setback variance of 5’ in conjunction with the redev elopment of the lot. I his application was initially <br />denied by the Planning Commission at their October meeting and tabled by the Council on November <br />s"' as the applicant revised the plan after the Planning Commission denial. <br />During the November 15''' Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission clarified with the <br />applicant that a 1-story rambler walk-out was proposed. To which the applicant stated that a I-story <br />rambler walk-out was the current plan. How does the proposed home style affect the variances as <br />proposed? Woulil a two-story home warrant similar variance approvals? With regard to the <br />applicant ’s request for an average setback variance of 5’, a two-story home would be a further <br />encroachment into the average lake setback than a 1-story home. The Council should discuss whether <br />vaiiance approvals should be conditioned on a specific home style. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />On November 15, 2004, Planning Commission voted 5-2 (dissen ’lng Commissioners ITit/.ler and <br />Jurgens felt additional hardcover reductions were warranted) to recommend approval of a variance <br />within the 75’-250’ zone for 36.8% hardcover or 2,824 s.f. and an average lake setback variance to <br />encroach 5’ into the average lake setback in conjunction with landscape restoration plan to be <br />approved.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.