My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 3:38:50 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 2:05:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
^. <br />I <br />NUV 8 20U4 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Cll Y Uh (JMUNU <br />Date; October 27, 2004 <br />Item No.: ^ <br />Department Approval: , ^ | <br />Name: Michael P. Gaffion <br />Title; Planning Director 'y * ' <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #t04-3024B Proposed Zoning Code Amendment: Section 78-1577(C)2a <br />- Large Vehicle Storage Pemiit - Ordinance <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Ordinance in Adoption Fonnat (Revised per Council 10/25/04) <br />B - Draft Application Fonn <br />Application Summary: Tliis ordinance amendment allows for continued large-velticle storage by those <br />property owners on 2-acrc to 5-acrc lots who have previously stored such vehicles, subject to a one <br />time pennit, and subject to generally the same conditions as established for lots of 5 acres or larjjer <br />Councii Action of 10-25-04: Council voted 5-0 to direct staff to draft a final version of the ordinance <br />for adoption, with a revision to condition 2(0 as follows: <br />f. In a shared driveway situation, the City must-have on file an agiccuKui signed by alF <br />uinent driveway users applicant shall demonstrate that the aroropriate easemcnt_exists. <br />Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed ordinance, subject to addressing <br />the discussion items noted below. _______________ <br />Items for Potential Discussion <br />An item for discussion is whether (or to what extent) the Council wishes to be involved in the pennit review <br />process. As written, the ordinance docs not address the review process, and it is assumed that such pemiits <br />will be reviewed and issued by staff without Council involvement. <br />The ordinance also docs not require any public hearing or neighbor notification. Should staff conclude that <br />an application does not qualify for the permit, the applicant could request a hearing by the Council tlirough <br />the administrative appeals process. <br />The ordinance revises the fee schedule for the remainder of2004 by establishing a $30.00 permit fee to <br />cever administrative costs. A first draft of the permit application form is attached.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.