My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 3:38:50 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 2:05:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 18,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Curtis stated the 1994 law that Mr. Ritter is discussing is the adoption of the Shorcland Overlay <br />Ordinance that identified French Lake as a natural environment lake requiring a 150-foot setback. <br />Curtis stated the amount of allowable hardcover in the 0-75’ setback zone was not changed at that time <br />and has remained the same since the late 1970’s. <br />Jurgens noted there currently is a variance for the hardcover on the property. <br />Spencer pointed out that the existing hardcover is less than what had existed previously on the <br />property. <br />Jurgens inquired whether the applicant would be willing to trade a deck for a gazebo. Jurgens staled <br />the applicant is allowed a certain amount of hardcover but that he would not be in favor of increasing <br />the hardcover that cuiTcntly exists on the property since there does not appear to be a hardship. <br />V/inkey questioned why the gazebo was not part of the original plan. <br />Spencer stated the gazebo was part of the original plan. <br />Ritter stated the plan for the gazebo for some reason was never submitted to the City and only the deck <br />was approved. <br />Curtis stated there was a phone conversation with staff concerning the gazebo but that no information <br />was ever supplied to the City during the original application. <br />Rahn potn'rd out one of the conditions for the hardcover variance was that the hardcover in the <br />0-75’ setback zone shall nol’y increased above 8 percent. <br />Curtis indicated the gazebo was discussed at the time of the application for the decks but that no <br />information was ever supplied to the City. <br />Bremer inquired whether any hardcover could be removed in the 0-75’ zone. <br />Spencer stated there is a cement dog pen. <br />Jurgens noted the dog pen is not shown on the survey but is located closer to the shoreline. <br />Spencer commented they have removed as much hardcover as possible. <br />PAGE 15 <br />A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.