My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
11-08-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 3:38:50 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 2:05:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 18,2004 <br />6:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />The applicant is also requesting a lake setback variance to allow a gazebo setback of 22 feet where a <br />150 feet structure setback is required and 45 feet currently exist. The existing home is located <br />approximately 50 feet from the ordinary water high level and the newly constructed decks are set back <br />45 feet. <br />Staff is recommending denial of the variances as requested as there is no hardship present to support <br />the request. <br />Ritter stated there arc grade changes in the rear of the yard that they arc attempting to accommodate <br />ill order to allow the property orvner access to her rear yard. Ritter stated the property is located on a <br />swamp, which makes the property almost unusable during the summertime due to inc mosquitoes. <br />Ritter stated they arc attempting to make the back yard functional and usable. <br />Rahn noted the property ovmer is allowed a pathway on a descending slope to the wetland. Rahn <br />inquired why one of the decks could not be screened in. <br />Spencer pointed out if the deck was screened in, it would obstruct her view from the house and cut <br />down on the amount of light that is allowed in. <br />Rahn slated according to the elevations, it appears the roof of the screened in deck would be at about <br />eye level. <br />Ritter pointed out the law requiring a 150-foot setback was not put into effect until 1994, with Mrs. <br />Spencer residing in this property for 20 years. <br />There were no public comments concerning this application. <br />Kempf stated he has loured this property and also felt the deck could be screened in. Kempf stated he <br />understands that does limit the light into the residence somewhat, but that the applicant must make a <br />choice on what type of hardcover she would like in order to help protect French Lake <br />Ritter reiterated that that law was not implemented until 1994, with his client residing in that residence <br />for ten years prior to that. <br />PAGE 14 <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.