Laserfiche WebLink
street." I’he lot line abutting Minnie Avenue is therefore the front lot line, <br />and the wcslerlv lot line is the rear lot line. <br />3. The granting of the requested variance would be contrary to the provisions <br />of Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-123 with which the applicant must <br />first comply in order that the variance be granted. The Council finds that: <br />a. The p: «jcrty in question can be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />the con. ilions allowed by the official controls if the proposed <br />variances were granted. <br />b. 'fhe pliglit of the landowner was created by a misinterpretation of what <br />is considered the front lot line for zoning purposes. However, even if <br />the applicant has interpreted the ordinance correctly variances would <br />still be required under this current proposal. <br />c. Granting of the proposed variance would appear to serve as a <br />convenience to the applicant and the applicant has not demonstrated a <br />reasonable hardship or practical difficulty acceptable to the City <br />Council. <br />d. The conditions of the Zoning Code limits imposed and existing on this <br />property generally apply to all other land and structures in the zoning <br />district in which this property is located as well as in adjacent <br />residential zoning districts. <br />4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br />and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br />comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the <br />health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 3