My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-26-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
07-26-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 11:54:35 AM
Creation date
1/25/2023 11:45:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: 6-23-04 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 7-9-04 <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: 9-8-04 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />JUL 'i 6 2004 <br />CirVOF ORONU <br />Date: July 21,2004 <br />Item No.: ^ <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Janice Gundlach^ ' <br />Title: City Planner <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: ^04-3036, Durabill Associates, Inc. on behalf of James Brooks. 3785 Watertown <br />Road - Variance <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />Lot Width: <br />RR - l.A, One Family Rural Residential District (5 acre minimum) <br />2.914 acres (128,126 s.f.) <br />118.29 feet <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - PC Action Notice 7-21-04 <br />B - PC Memo and Exhibits of 7-9-04 <br />C - Illu.stration Showing Alternative Design <br />Application Summary: Applicant requests the following in order to construct an <br />attached 2 stall garage in front of the existing 1 stall garage: <br />1. Side yard setback variance to allow an eastern side yard setback of 10 ’ when <br />14.4 ’ currently exists and .50 ’ is normally required. <br />Staff Recommendation : Staff recommends denial of the requested variance to allow a <br />10 ’ eastern side yard setback. Staff, however would support approval of a side yard <br />setback variance of 14.4 ’ when 30’ is required due to the existing 14.4 ’ setback of the <br />house and attached garage and the nai row ness of the lot. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />The Plaiming Commission, at their July 19. 2004 meeting, voted 5-1-1 with Commissioner Fritzler <br />voting against and Commissioner Kempf abstaining, to approve the request allowing a 10' side yard <br />setback. The Commission stated the lot shape as the hardship to allow for the 10 ’ side yard setback. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff continues to recommend denial of the request to allow the 10 ’ side yard setback. The location <br />of the existing home should limit the encroachment on the side yard setbacks as the lot is extremely
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.