Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, JUNE 21.2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p in <br />Jurgens coniincnted (hat the Irousing styles, expanded cxteiior color range, landscaping and public <br />gathering spaces were all positives. However, he also was unsure about accepting the proposed <br />density and did not support the shorter driveways with vehicles extending over the sidewalk Chair <br />Malnr.th and Rahn concurred with Jurgens ’ comments. <br />Chair Mabusth concluded the discussion by repeating the request for a concept design for the Dumas <br />property when the matter returns to the Planning Commission. <br />NIN(; COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />10. loimm^r planning commission rf .pui seni atives a <br />COilNCIL MFmNGS M,\Y 24, 2004 AND JCNE 14. 2UU4. <br />DING Cl rv <br />l•■|i(/Ic•l irpuilctl on tlic M^^^^)04 City Council meeting irdic.HjPTthat all Planning Commission <br />ni.iltcis went on the C'onscnl Cliaii Mahnstli repoit^^^^he Reliance Development <br />(Stonehay Conimeicial PUD) and ifi^fcljiliauglincssy icstor.ition with hoaidwalk <br />apphe.itions was considered at the Juncl^^lUM (.htu^PCncil meeting Council Mcnibei 1 iaison <br />lull McMillan explained her position on the Sl®®Tpiopo.sal alunit opposing tiie traffic layout <br />heiwcrii Walgreens and the neighboring rct^^mul^^^hc had conceins about paikcil vehicles <br />backing out of parking stalls into the tijyj^^iic, ctniser^fc^- blocking and shewing tlir traffic lane. <br />Also. McMillan siiiiimari/cd h|^^ilion on the 0 ’SI’.aiighncssy'!S^||fattou to allow the boardwalk <br />over the shoichnc icstoratu^^gelalion as a valid li.inlship to access'l^fcLikcshcre over the restored <br />area. <br />11. U I1I]0^SI'ES I’OU DISCUSSION <br />>» t:.lining session he recently attended at which a participant qucstio:icd^||^hcra <br />iitiotul use permit for height is legal or docs it have to be rcvicvsed .md .ippun cd as a \ anance <br />Page 2*) of 31