07-12-2004 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r MINUTES OF THE ORONOCITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 28, 2004 7:00 o ’clock p.m. (6, m4-2974 RELIANCE DEV ELOPMENT COMPANY, LLP, WILLOW/I2 (STONEBA Y OUTLOT A) - GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN/FINAL PLAT, Continued) Planning Commission or City Council action to determine whether the proposed use is similar enough to one of the listed uses to be allowable, or request to amend the PUD. Finally, Gaffron stated that the City Engineer has provided a final letter establishing the required amount for the letter of credit at S750.000. Since the applicant has complied with the conditions established by the City in the Comp Plan Amendment for this site, and has revised plans to be in conformance with the recommendations of the City Engineer and the City’s Planning Consultant, it would be staffs recommendation to adopt the documents for: 1) Ilie General Development Plan Approval and I iiial Plat Approval Resolution 2) Rezoning Ordinance 3) Acceptance ot the PUD 4A Agreement and authorize Mayor and staff to execute said agreement upon City Attorney acceptance of final language Vickie Vandel. representative of Reliance Development Corporation, stated that they wish to avoid coming back for repeated amendments to the permitted uses list; therefore, suggest adding line item 29 other non-food retail uses. She questioned whether staff has some ability in accepting similar uses. Gaffron slated that there is an appeal process in place for determining permitted and non-permitted u.ses which can be brought before Council for review. White suggested that staff amend their position to state if an unlisted use is requested, staff rot/W reject it and the applicant at that time could appeal staffs interpretation and request PC/Council action to determine whether the pro|X)sed use is similar enough to one of the listed uses as to be allowable, or would have to request to amend the PUD. Moorsc concurred, stating that if a substantially similar use is presented to staff, they could determine at staff level to accept or reject the use. Gaffron indicated that language could be added to item 29 allowing staff to make some detenninalions regarding similar use. He asked w hether Council wished to sec evergreens along the Highway 12 expanse. White stated that the evergreens would be a nice addition to bieak up the expanse during the winter months and give the property some landscaping apix'al. Vamicl stated that she would w ork w ith staff to determine w here to place the evergreens. While moved, Sansevere seconded, adopting RESOUTION .NO. 5201, a Kesolution granting General Development Plan Approval for Planned I'nit Development No. 4A for Stonebay ('ommercial LI.C and Approving the Plat of Stonebay Commercial - File No. 04-2974 subject to the landscape additions of Evergreens discussed. >'OTE: Aves 4, Navs 0. PAGE II of 19