07-12-2004 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 28, 2004 7:00 o’clock p.m. (PUBLIC COMMENTS, Cominued) Although there is no one easy solution to this problem, McMillan stated that the City needs to come up with something to resolve this for these people. Sansevere asked why staff couldn't just host a face to face meeting to explain to these residents how simple running the pijic across the back of their properties would be. Mayor Paterson asked if the Council and staff could all agree Uiat this is something that w ill be resolved yet this fall. Gappa agreed. The Council unanimously concurred. Mrs. Nusbaum thanked the Council for their time. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT *5. #04-2%9 TERRY AND GRETCHEN BLOUNT, 1390 CHERRY PLACE - VARIANCES/CONDITIONAL i:SE PERMIT - RESOLITION NO. 5200 White moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5200, a Resolution amending Resolution it5l27 granting a hardcover variance and a building*to-building setback variance for 1390 Cherry Place to allow construction of a covered entry with the remodel project. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 6. «04-2974 RELIANCE DEVELOPMENT COMPANT, LLP, WTLLO\V/l2 (STONEBAY Ol TLOT A) - GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN/FINAL PLAT - RESOl.UTION NO. 5201, ORDINANf E NO. 14,3"" SERIES Gaffron c.xplained that the Applicants have requested General Development Plan Approval and Final Plat Approval, as well as. Ordinance Re/oning subject to its not becoming effective ntil all required documents have Inren executed to the satisfaction of staff and the City Attorney. Gaffron pointed out that the applicants had provided mylars for final plat approval and final building materials boards rcllccting the darker brick as directed, lie questioned whether the Council wished to include evergreens along the 400-500’ Highway 12 frontage. Gaffron indicated that the applicant’s attorney has suggested a number of minor changes to the Preliminary Plat Resolution and the ( icneral Concept Plan Approval Resolution adopted on June 14. While most of the changes arc inconsequential and under review by the Attorney and staff. Gaffron stated that Reliance Development Company LLC is assigning their interests to a replacement entity, Slonebay Commercial LLC. for legal purposes, and diKuments w ill be revised to reflect those changes In addition, the applicant's attorney has requested that the rezoning ordinance add to the list of allow ed uses a final line item. "«3‘* other non-food retail uses". Gaffron pointed out that staff has rejected this requested change giv en the amount of time devoted by the Planning Commission in establishing this list of allowed uses. He stated that if an unlisted use is requested, staff would rejeet it and the applicant could appeal staff s interpretation and request PAGE 10 of 19