My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
06-28-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 12:17:53 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 10:31:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
;p methods affect the individual <br />outlet land that is owned by an <br />‘off limits’ in terms of the various <br />r by the neighbors as a group. <br />d of neighborhood recreational uses <br />s are moie likely monitored by the <br />lal use as a trespass. <br />:rved open space should be within <br />ition. Staff recommends the latter. <br />#04-301( <br />May 14,2004 <br />Page 6 <br />6. Park/Trail Easements or Dedication Needed <br />The City has no current plans for trails or parks that specifically require dedication of land from this <br />property. However, the southerly part of the property abuts the Luce Line and as an outlet, the <br />preserved land south of the creek would make a nice addition to the trail corridor, with potential <br />public walking access to the creek. This unique configuration should be looked at by the Park <br />Commission to determine whether the dedication of land could result in regional trail access to the <br />creek. While this might not be within the property owners ’ expectations for the property, the City <br />does have an 8% Park Dedication requirement and the public benefits of such an access must at least <br />be considered. Absent dedication of land for parks, the Park Dedication Fee would be expected to <br />be the maximum fee which by ordinance is capped at S5,550 per new lot. <br />IS required by the Subdivision Code <br />or this road would be 28', as it will <br />jth; the proposed road width is 24’, <br />hibit G, Tom Kellogg’s comments). <br />:rship and maintenance, and subject <br />anted to the City. <br />c existing 40' easement used by Van <br />mable whether this requirement can <br />jtablished policy of obtaining, at the <br />ain private roads used by multiple <br />ortation Plan, CMP Part 4A, Rural <br />^ 6 states; <br />ince levels and public access on all <br />it subdivisions, the City will acquire <br />sements over all private reads. These <br />ill properties served by the private road. <br />IS of financial responsibility will assure <br />ccording to City approved standards and <br />tat all private roads are maintained to <br />iired maintenance agreements and/or <br />nvate group to so maintain their private <br />needed maintenance and to assess the <br />lintenance.” <br />7. Road Improvements and/or Eas«'ments Needed <br />The City will require Road, Drainage and Utilities Easements over the private road, which should <br />be platted as an outlet as proposed, to be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. <br />Access to Brewn Road . The plat does not include the existing access corridor to Brown Road, as that <br />property is not owned by the applicant but by Mary Dunn of 20 Brown Road South. This 40' <br />corridor is an easement, and is the subject of ongoing legal action between Dunn and Van Eeckhout <br />in terms of what rights are associated with the existing easement. In addition to the 40' tasement, <br />an additional 1 O' road casement exists along the north 1 O' of the plat of Kallestad Acres, granting the <br />City “an easement for ingress, egress, access, read and utilities purposes and uses’’, hence the use <br />of that 10' strip appears to be unquestionable. The total corridor width is 50, and the road should be <br />located to make use of this width, although the current design shows it is primarily being located <br />in the northerly 40'. <br />The City will require that the current driveway be upgraded to City standards all the way out to <br />Brown Road. The City Engineer has recommended tl«.L the easement portion of the private road be <br />platted. As of this writing, however, it seems urilikely that either adjoining neighbor would be <br />interested in becoming part of the plat. This recommendation is not necessarily a requirement, but <br />would result in a cleaner legal description. <br />8. Stormwater and Drainage Improvements and/or Easements Needed <br />Development of the property will require creation of stormwater management facilities. The <br />applicant is proposing a runoff rate/quality control stormwater pond behind the building site within <br />Lot 7 to serve the subdivision. The City Engineer has made a number of recommendations which <br />the developer must adhere to (sec Exhibit G). <br />The property will be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trtink Fee, established cuacntly at <br />$2700 per acre for the 2-acrc zone, or $54,000 for this 20-acre site.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.