My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
06-28-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 12:17:53 PM
Creation date
1/25/2023 10:31:39 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: 4-21-04 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 4-21-04 <br />120-Day Review Period Expires: 8-20-04 <br />To:Chair Mabusth and Planning Commissioners <br />Ron Moorsc, City Administrator <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Mike Gaffron, Planning Director <br />May 14, 2004 <br />vA <br />#04-3016 Henry Lazniarz/Wayzata Design & Development -120 Brown Road S. <br />Preliminary Plat - Planned Residential Development (PRD) - Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: <br />Lot Area: <br />RR-IB Single Family Rural Residential, 2-acrc min. <br />20 acres Total, 14 Acres +. Dry Buildable <br />Application Summary: This is a proposed 7-lot residential plat (PRD) of property abutting the <br />Luce Line Trail and Long Lake Creek. The developer, Henry Lazniarz of Wayzata Design and <br />Development, is purchasing the property from the Van ’"cckhouts <br />The proposal includes development of a private cul-dc-sac road accessing from Drown Road <br />South. The property is in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area but does not abut any existing <br />municipal sewer lines. The proposal includes obtaining municipal water and sewer from the City <br />of Long Lake. The site is wooded and contains an existing single family residence. <br />This property was the subject of extensive reviews by the Planning Commission and Council <br />during the period 1999-2001. A variety of schemes ranging from 4 lots to 7 lots had been <br />proposed, but the ultimate result was denial based on the lack of suitable access to the site. <br />The owners of the property, the Van Eeckhouts, have taken legal action to have their existing <br />casement declared as usable for access to the property. City Attorney Tom Barrett has reviewed <br />the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of Judge Holahan filed on May 5,2004, and <br />has concluded that the findings indicate the existing access easement docs not provide suitable <br />access meeting all regular City requirements for subdivision. However, Mr. Barrett suggests that <br />the City proceed with review of the application through the preliminary plat approval stage. If the <br />developer ultimately cannot meet the conditions imposed by the City for final plat approval, final <br />plat approval will not be granted. <br />Staff Recommendation: The nature of this property is such that a relatively small portion of the <br />20-acrc total is suitable for actual construction, due to the existence of wetlands, drainage ways, <br />the creek, and steep slopes. The property is a candidate for d vclopmcnt as a PRD, in staff s <br />opinion. <br />Planning Commission is advised to make iccoiumendatioits regarding a small number of issues <br />that will affect the layout of the subdivision. The result of those conclusions will affect the final <br />recommendation to Council, and the final plat layout.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.