Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, MAY 17, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Kempf sttted he agreed with the entire proposal except that if it were an outlet with neignborhood <br />responsibility for the area he expected the neighborl jod would evolve differently from individually owned <br />lots. <br />13. ##04-3017 SPRUCE HILL PROPERTIES, INC., 3775 BAYSIDE RO.AD, VARIANCES, PUBLIC <br />HEAPING (11:42-11:50 p.m.) <br />Dave Thorp, Spruce Hill Properties, Inc., applicant, was present. <br />Curtis explained the application requesting hardcover, lake setback and rear yard (street) setback variances in <br />order to do an extensive remodel, which consists of renovating the first floor and rc-constructing the '/i story <br />above. She recommended approval of the application and plans as submitted due to the hardships inherent to <br />the configuration of the property, in particular, the shallow lot depth and size and location of the existing home <br />on the lot. <br />Matt Cookson, Spruce Hill Properties, agreed that the shallow natu-e of the property makes limited buildable <br />area, as the lake yard setback and front yard setback overlap. He stated the house now sits on the most <br />conforming location on the lot meeting the 30’side yard setback. The proposed remodel is on the existing <br />foundation and slightly reduces the amount of existing hardcover. Further, he suggested they could reduce the <br />cement patio to the setback of the deck, reducing it about 6 back. <br />Dave Thorp, Spruce Hill Properties, conunented that the deck is essential to the property. <br />Chair Mabusth pointed out the existing patioAanding is cracked and suggested it be replaced. The applicants <br />indicated it is proposed to be replaced. <br />Chair Mabusth moved, Kempf seconded, to recommend approval of Application #04-3017, Spruce Hill <br />Properties, to grant a hardcover variance to permit less than 3.3% hardcover within the 0-75 zone <br />when 0% U normally allowed and 3.9% currently exists (removal of 7.5’ x 2.5’ chimney shaft) and when <br />added to the 75’-230’ zone allowance yields total hardcover of less than 30% due to the reduction in size <br />of the patio by about 6’, to grant a lake setback variance to permit structure within 75’ of the lake and <br />to grant a street yard setback variance to permit a 22’ setback when 50’ Is normally requi.-ed and 22’ <br />currently exists. She commented thet this Is certainly a hardship lot. <br />Chair Mabusth asked for public comment. There were none,