06-14-2004 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#04-2974 Stoncbiy Mtrkctplacc April IS, 2004 Page 10 4. The City Engineer has not had adequate time to review engineering matters for this new plan set. 5. Does Planning Commission have any problems with the proposed height of the buildings (all expected to meet the 30' limit except the Walgreens comer feature). 6. Applicant must address the enclosure and screening of trash facilities. 7. To what extent are additional trees needed along the Willow Drive and Highway 12 frontages? 8.Applicant must submit revised building elevations and should also provide perspective/oblique views to help PC assess the building proximity/lack of separation impacts. 9. Applicant should provide options for facade coloration for review. 10. Applicant should further refine the right-in, right-out access and the dead-end parking turnaround per the recommendations of the City Engineer. 11. Applicant should address the loading berth issue. 12 . Planning Commission should consider whether the 6-stall parking shonage (based on City Code) is acceptable given Walgreens history of parking needs, the proof of parking available, and the current mix of uses that does not include a free-standing family restaurant, which would have greater parking needs than can be accommodated at the proposed level of retail space (1 stall per 80 s.f. rather than I stall per 150 s.f.).. 13. Applicant must provide a detailed signage plan for all buildings and for site monument signs. 14. Applicant must provide a plan for building-mounted lighting, and confirm the design of the parking lot fixtures. 15 . Planning Conunission .should consider whether the combination ofbuilding proximity visual impacts, the pedestrian terrace amenity placed on the adjacent NlnDOT parcel, tlie overage in lot coverage, and other site factors suggest the need for further building down-sizing on the west lot. 16. Any other issues for consideration.