My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-14-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
06-14-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 11:14:59 AM
Creation date
1/25/2023 8:56:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
627
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, MAY 17, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Gaffron explained site drains issues arc reviewed when the applicant applies for a-building permit. He <br />suggested the Planning Commission could add a condition in recommending approval of the lot area vanance <br />that centrally locates the house. However, Gaffron noted that if the applicant were not agreeable to that <br />condition, it would not be enforceabi <br />V * <br />Mr. Jacques stated that he was willing to a^ept the condition^/jTcentrally locating the house and pool. <br />Chair Mabusth summarized that centrally locate^he house and pool location results in a larger setback than <br />the proposed location at the 5’ side yard setback anh,l5' pool rear yard setback. <br />Chair Mabusth called for further public comments w'ere none. <br />\ <br />9 ^ <br />Jurgens moved, Leslie seconded', to recommend approval of Application #01-2671, Alistair and Karen <br />Jacques, 645 Old Long Lake Road, granting a lot area variai^e to permit construction of a new <br />residence on an e.xisting lot which is 1.022 acres In area when 2.0.acres is normally required, with the <br />y \condition that the^proposed house/garage/pool is more centrally located on the lot that shown on the <br /># <br />variance application. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />\ <br />\ <br />Fritzler inquired about a trailer that may be on Jacques' property. Mr. Jacques'ujdicated he was not aware of <br />any. trailer behind his shed. Ms. Thompson responded that it was on her property. <br />/ <br />^ Gaffron advised Application #01-2671 will be scheduled for the June 14, 2004 City Council session <br />5. #04-2974 RELIANCE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLP, “STONEBAY MARKETPLACE,” <br />NVV QUADRANT mVY 12AV1LLOW DRIVE, COMMERCLVL PUD DEVELOPMENT, <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING (6:28-6:59 p.m.) <br />John Trautz, Reliance Development, Vickie Van Dell, Landform Engineering and Mike Spina, Amcon <br />Construction, the applicant's representatives, were present. <br />Gaffron reported the receipt of the Waiver of Further Review of the Orono Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />for the proposed Commercial PUD Development from the Metropolitan Council on May 17, 2004, completing <br />Uiat part of the application. The Cottqjrchcnsivc Plan Amendment will be brought to the City Council for final <br />action, <br />? I <br />i-. <br />p >•y. . Page 6 of 58 X ¥ B ' V *: * <br />il: i.;Ttf
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.