Laserfiche WebLink
( <br />W4-2993 <br />April 13,2004 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections <br />Sec. 78-642. Permit application. All applications for a building permit in any B-1 retail <br />sales business district shall be reviewed by the council zmd may be referred to the <br />planning commission for review. <br />Sec. 78-646. Area, height, lot width, setback requirements and design requirements. <br />(c) Front yar^. The minimum front yard shall be 20 feet. <br />(d) Rear yards. The minimum rear yard shall be 30 feet, a side yard adjacent to any R <br />district shall be 15 feet, and a side yard adjacent to a street shall be ten feet. <br />(e) Setback requirements. No building shall be nearer than 35 feet to any front lot <br />line, 35 feet from any rear lot line, 15 feet from any side lot line, or 35 feet to a <br />side lot line adjacent to a street; except abutting or across the street from an R <br />district, no building shall be less than 35 feet from such lot line. <br />Sec. 78-644. Conditional uses. Within the B-1 retail sales business district, no structure <br />or land shall be used for one of the following uses without a conditional use permit: <br />(3) Restaxuant (class I), in which food is served to customers while seated at coimter <br />or table, or cr'’..cria. in which food is selected by a customer while going through <br />a line and taken to a table for consumption. Neither live entertainment nor <br />intoxicating liquor sales are permitted in class I restaurants. <br />Background <br />This application was originally heard before the Planning Commission at the March 15, <br />2004 meeting. The applicant presented three plans, all with drive-through facilities, one <br />of which was passed out at the meeting. Staffs recommendation was for the applicant to <br />work on a plan that doesn ’t incorporate a drive through, which is presented as Ae <br />alternate plan in this report. The applicant still is pursuing a drive-through and has <br />presented a plan that has been reviewed by an engineer per staffs recommendation (see <br />Exhibit D). The details of both plans are discussed below. <br />The applicant also met with Building Official Lyle Oman to discuss the issues of <br />converting the residential use to commercial. No issues, other than the handicap ramp, <br />were factors to be considered when approving the specifics of the site plan. <br />The applicant also met with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, which is not <br />requiring any on-site mitigation for storm water. <br />Site Details of Drive-Through Plan <br />NEGATIVES <br />The same safety and functionality issues still exist with this plan, although at a lesser <br />extent than the previous plans. The exit for the drive-through aisle remains very close to <br />the intersection of Lyric and the City owned parking lot ’s drive aisle (15’). Under this <br />plan the applicant is proposing 2 parking stalls, which are forced to back into traffic when <br />leaving the site. <br />I . il 1 I i T .1 I 1 1 1 i 1 . ! I i!