Laserfiche WebLink
L,^ <br />Motion 1: <br />Denial of the plan which incorporates a drive-through facility as the site cannot support the <br />requested drive-through, which creates the need for approval of unnecessary front yard parking <br />setback and hardcover variances. <br />VOTE:FOR AGAINST <br />The 3 dissenting commissioners, Berg, Bremer, and Jurgens II, felt because the site could <br />functionally work with a drive-through one should be permitted because the naffic concerns were <br />minor and the intensely developed nature of the site is consistent with that of the Navarre <br />neighborhood. <br />Motion 2: <br />Approval of the alternate plan consistent with the following staff recommendation: <br />Approval of the plan without a drive-througli, which includes approval of a conditional use <br />permit, building setback variance and rear yard parking setback variance, with the stipulation <br />that the 3-season porch be removed in an effort to reduce the non-conforming side street <br />building setback requirement. <br />Also, adding that the applicant has the option to incorporate the 3-season porch on the conforming <br />side of the building where a deck is proposed. <br />VOTE:FOR AGAINST <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Approval per the attached Resolution, which approves Motion U2 and the alternative plan without a <br />drive-through. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Adopt the attached Resolution granting commercial site plan approval including a rear yard parking <br />setback variance, a north side setback variance, and a conditional use permit for 2377 Shadywood <br />Road, <br />or. <br />Direct staff to draft a resolution approving the plan that includes a drive-throu^ for approval at the <br />next regularly scheduled meeting. <br />I <br />I