Laserfiche WebLink
File N04-2977 <br />Jenunry 20,2004 <br />Page 10 of 11 <br />recommend that the Planning Commission consider “Hours of Operation” conditions, <br />keeping in mind tliat the restaurant is adjacent to a residentially zoned area. <br />The applicant is also proposing a trash receptacle to be used in conjunction with the <br />proposed restaurant. It must be setback 10* from the south lot line and located further <br />west than east, or against the building in an effort to keep it away from the residential <br />dwelling adjacent to the property. It should also be sufficiently screened. <br />Issues for Discussion <br />1. Should greater setbacks be required for the existing gravel parking lot to allow <br />establishment of a formal green-space yard? If so, what is appropiiate? How many <br />paridng stalls are needed to adequately serve the site? <br />2. Should the City require that tlie existing gravel parking area be paved and striped? <br />Should the existing lower parking area be re-striped? <br />3. Should the Planning Commission require specific exterior building materials for the <br />proposed entrances, or should the applicant be free to submit plans for ? building <br />permit using any of the materials outlined in Section 78-646 (B)? <br />4. Should any additional screening be implemented along the southern property line? <br />Should trash facilities be located adjacent to :he building rather than near the <br />residential lot line? <br />5. Should the sign located in the Kelly Avenue right-of-way be eliminated in exchange <br />for a larger sign at the northeast comer of Shoreline Drive and Kelly Avenue, which <br />would incorporate all the businesses occupying the building? <br />6. Is the lighting plan appropriate? <br />7. Should the proposed sign at the northeast comer of Shoreline Drive and Kelly <br />Avenue be required to be a monument style sign rather than a pole style? Should it <br />be oriented perpendicular to Shoreline Drive, or is the angled orientation proposed <br />acceptable? <br />8. Should “Hours of Operation” be specified for the restaurant? If so, what hours are <br />appropriate? <br />9. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Deparunent staff recommends the following: <br />1) Approval of a commercial site plan incorporating the following: <br />a) The upper gravel parking lot be further refined in accordance with the <br />Planning Coimnission's recommendation regarding the amount of green <br />space to be established and the number of new stalls to be constructed.