Laserfiche WebLink
la <4 <br />MINin'fiS OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, APRIL 19, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />Mr. Keaveny replied tlie bowling alley would stay there. <br />Berg expressed her viewpoint that a Class II restaurant would not be approved for there and that there <br />were other uses there, and look a lot different, too. She mentioned there could be less gravel and <br />black-top and improved landscape on the site. If there is going to be bowling alley there, Berg stated <br />she wants to have the upper area fixed up as welt including the landscaping. She recommended that <br />if Mr. Keaveny undertakes improvements, she would expect a ‘soHer’ look to the site with improved <br />landscaping. <br />Mr. Keaveny replied that green spaces, a new retaining wall, striping of the parking lot and building <br />upgrades had been pail of the proposal with Mr. Ode. <br />Berg repeated her position to oppose a liquor license and restaurant but did not oppose continuation <br />of the bowling alley use. <br />Bremer asked Berg if she thought that same about a 3.2 beer license. Berg did not answer as it is not <br />the role of the Planning Commission to decide. <br />Mr. Keaveny asked Berg if she thought a restaurant without a liquor license was a good use. <br />Berg replied that she did not think of a bowling alley with a destination restaurant but rather had a <br />snack bar instead. <br />Mr. Keavny indicated he has received expressed interest in the last nine months for league bowling. <br />Page 9 of 11 <br />1 <br />i