My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
04-26-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:55:25 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 4:08:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
447
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, APRIL 19, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />noise. Further, he mentioned that motorcyclists patrons also create noise for the neighborhood. He <br />expressed his concern that more neighborhood noise will be created if the application is approved. <br />Cliristine Hardten, 2515 Kelly Avenue, expressed her concern for the adaitional traffic associated <br />with the application in addition to what is associated with the Narrows, at a hazardous turn onto Kelly <br />Avenue, and the continuing trash problem witli cans and bottles. She did not think parking is a <br />hardship. She explained that delivery trucks are a current noise issue, especially from tl’e near-by <br />townhomes, as well as the band and choppers noise, all which would worsen with an expanded <br />bowling alley/restaurant business. Ms. Hardten repeated her viewpoint that more traffic and trash is <br />not what their neighborhood wants. <br />Chair Mabusth referenced the staff report and directed the Planning Commission’s attention to the <br />Issues for Consideration. Chair Mabusth reported that she attended the March 22,2004 City Council <br />meeting as the Planning Commission representative and advised that the City Council had a iist of <br />reasons and negative impacts on the neighborhood when denying the liquor license for Mr. Ode . <br />She reiterated that it is the Plamiing Commission responsibility to consider a Class II restaurant to be <br />added to the existing favility. Chair M.abiisth asked Mr. Keaveny if he understood the Council’s <br />action. <br />Mr. Keaveny repeated his earlier statements saying he had no problem without the restaurant liquor <br />license. <br />Berg inquired if Mr. Keaveny would keep the bowling alley there and did he understand that there <br />likely would not be a Class II restaurant.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.