Laserfiche WebLink
•'X:* * -RLEM4-2968 <br />2Marah2004 <br />Ptg«2ors <br />See 78-282. Lekeihorc hard cover and land alteration regulationi. <br />In any LR-IA, LR-IB, LR-IC or LR-lC-1 district, within 75 feet of shoreline, there shall <br />be no excavating, filling, hard cover, temporary or permanent structures except as <br />permitted under section 78-281. Within 75 to 250 feet of the shoreline, there shall be no <br />greater than 25 percent hard cover. Within 250 feet to 500 feet of the shoreline, there <br />shall be no greater 30 percent hard cover. Within 500 feet to 1,000 feet of the <br />shoreline, there shall be no greater than 35 percent hard cover. <br />(Code 1984, § 10.22(2)) <br />Sec. 78-330. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. <br />(a) Height. No structure or building in an LR-IB district shall exceed 2 1/2 stories or 30 <br />feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366. <br />Lm Am <br />(•era) <br />Ut Width (fleet}Front Yard <br />(feet) <br />Side Yard Adjacent to <br />Another Lot (feet) <br />Rear Yard <br />(feet) <br />Side Yard Adjacent to <br />Street (feet) <br />\140 35 10 30 35 <br />Sec. 78-1403. Lot coverage. <br />In nil districts, for all lots of 0-1.99 acres in total area, the total combined <br />footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15 percent of the <br />lot area. Exception: Regardless of lot area, every developed lot shall be allowed at least <br />1,500 square feet of lot coverage by principal residence and garage structures. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A. Application <br />B. Hardship Documentation Form <br />C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site <br />Plan <br />D. Hennepin County Assessor Report <br />E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br />F. Adjacent Property Owners <br />Acknowledgement Form <br />G. Photos <br />H. Property Owners List <br />I. Plat M^) <br />J. Resolution No 2047 <br />K. Additions and Final Hardcover from <br />1986 approval <br />Background <br />The applicants, Sean and Leah Daly, are the property owners at 605 Park Lane. The <br />iq>plicants are requesting after-the-fact variances in order to allow newly constructed <br />decks to remain, and allow re-construction of a 2"^ story deck. After purchasing the <br />property the applicants removed the existing decks which were rotted, unsafe and not <br />functionally efficient with the layout of the home as they existed they also removed <br />sidewalk, and installed boulder walls in order to make t^ir property more functional. <br />Not realizing that permits vnn required, the applicants replaced the decks. <br />The applicants are also requesting to replace a 2"'^ story deck (36 s.f) on the lake side of <br />the home. The applicants removed the old deck as the wood was rotted and unsafe. This <br />2"^ story deck would be constructed over the existing hardcover and structural coverage <br />(landing & stairs) below and at the same size and location of the previous deck.