My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:54:44 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 3:25:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i04<2974 Stoncbay Marketplace <br />March 12.2004 <br />Page 3 <br />Summary of Issues to Address <br />Is there a set of parameters within which the Planning Commission would conclude that the Comp Plan <br />amendment converting from office to retail uses, is appropriate? <br />• Does the Planning Commission support the concept of the conversion to retail uses to provide <br />the elements necessary to complete a self-contained, mixed-use neighborhood? <br />If so, the Planning Commission could provide conceptual iqjproval of the Comp Plan amendment, subject <br />to detailing a set of development parameters that would ensure the site is developed in a way that does <br />provide the elements necessary complete a self-contained mixed-use neighborhood. <br />- Does Planning Commission conclude that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is appropnate <br />as presented, with the proposed conversion to primarily retail uses? If not. what aspects of it are <br />inappropriate? What, if anything, might be changed to make it acceptable? <br />- Does Planning Commission agree with the concepts and development parameters described <br />in the March 1 letter? Should any of those concepts be modified, strergthened or changed? <br />> Regarding the proposed rezoning to B6-PUD, in add! tion to the list of allowed permitted uses <br />and conditional uses reviewed and i fined on February 18, are there any additional specific <br />parameters that need to be addressed? <br />Recommended Action <br />Staff recommends that Planning Commission do the following at your March IS meeting: <br />1.Discuss and make a recommendation to Council as to whether the CMP should be amended to <br />re-guide the site from primarily office to primarily retail uses. <br />2.If you recommend in favor of the amendment, you should also do the following: <br />a) Review and confirm the list of allowed uses you determined are appropriate for this <br />property; and <br />b) Review carefully the development goals and parameters laid out in the staff letter of <br />March 1 and confirm whether these are conditions that should be incorporated into the <br />text of a CMP amendment. <br />Your recommendations will be forwarded to the City Council on March 22 for review and possible action <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.