My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
03-22-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 8:54:44 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 3:25:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
•04 2974 Stoncbay MirkclpUcc <br />MifciilZ, 2004 <br />Ptgt2 <br />List of Exhibits <br />A • March 4,2004 Staff Memorandum to Planning Commission and Council <br />B • March 1,2004 Staff Letter to Applicant <br />C • March 3, 2004 Letter from Applicant <br />D • Revised Site Plan #17 <br />E • March 2,2004 City Engineer Comments re Site Plan #17 <br />F - February 17,2004 Staff Memo: Supplementary Comments <br />G - Compilation of Appropriate Uses from February 17 Discussions <br />H • February 13,2004 Staff Memo and Selected Exhibits <br />I - Draft PC Minutes 2-17-04 <br />Discussion <br />Staffbelieves this site can be planned in such a way as to provide the types of uses and amenities needed <br />to enhance die surrounding neighborhood as a walkable, somewhat self-contained, mixed-use mini-village. <br />Staff supports the <..omp)! y.iensive Plan Amendment and the rezoning to P-6 PUD. subject to the <br />parameters and goals delineated in the March 1 letter to the applicant. Tnese concepts would be <br />incorporated into the text of the CMP as requirements for development of the site. <br />IfPlanning Conunission agrees with the comments and principles of the March 1 letter, there is no point <br />in going ahead with a detailed review of the current site plan until a substantially revised plan is submitted. <br />PlanningCommission should reach a conclusion or the Comp Plan Amendment before proceeding with <br />it.5 site plan review. <br />As noted at your February meeting, the rezoning goes hand in hand with the Comp Plan Amendment, and <br />can provide for a greater level of detail than the Plan. Planning Commission identi fied a specific list of <br />allov/able or unacceptable uses for the site in Febmary, and these will be incorporated into the Pi ID <br />rezonj.ig for this site. The PUD approval for this site becomes the governing ordinance for thepropeuy, <br />and shonM be carefully crafted to ensure that only ^propriate uses are allowed under appropriate <br />condition.s. <br />Finally, note that Planning Commission must make a recommendation on the Comp Plan Amendment at your <br />March 15 meeting, in order to conform with the statutory 120-day review period, which ends April 15 (prior <br />to your next meeting). <br />M
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.