Laserfiche WebLink
FII.Ei04-2982 <br />27 Fibfv«ry2004 <br />Pag«4or4 <br />iMuct for Cons^dcnitioii <br />1. If Planting Commission concludes that a hardship exists, they should discuss a <br />reasonable square footage and whether the deck should be required to meet the 75’ <br />setback. <br />2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendat.:^a <br />Planning Department stafi reconunends denial of the after-the-fact variances as <br />requested. The applicant should be allowed to construct a small landing for safety <br />purposes. <br />However, should the Planning Commission find a hardship to allow the after-the-fact <br />hardcover variance, Planning Staff recommends removal of the portion of the deck <br />extending into the 75* lake setback. <br />L <br />■ <br />II <br />.i• = <br />'i <br />^ i <br />i <br />i