My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
04-12-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:31:02 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 2:48:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I- •« <br />V ii FiLEi04-29S2 <br />27 February 2004 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />Lilt of Exhibit! <br />A. Application <br />B. Ha^hip Documentation Form <br />C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan <br />D. Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br />E. Revised Hardcover Calculations <br />F. Hennepin County Assessor Report <br />0. Aerial Photo <br />H. Adjacent Property Owners <br />Acknowledgement Form <br />1. Property Owners List <br />J. Plat Map <br />K. Photos <br />Background <br />The owners of 1398 Rest Point Road are Lyle and Claryce "Corky” Johnson. The <br />property was previously owned by the applicant's parents, and is currently being used as <br />rental property. In coxyunction with an interior remodel in the summer of 2003, a grade* <br />level lakeside deck was constructed. The applicants were not aware that a building <br />permit and hardcover, and setback variaiKes were required in order to construct the deck. <br />The qiplicants have indicated that their project was to replace an existing, deteriorating <br />deck. Staff has not found evidence that a deck previously existed on the property. A <br />Hennepin County Assessor visited the site in the summer of 2000 and a deck was not <br />noted on the site plan (Exhibit E). Additionally, staff has examined historical aerial <br />photos and has been unable to conclude whether or not there was a deck or even a patio <br />on the property. The applicants were asked for any photos documenting the deck and <br />have been unable to locate any such photos. <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br />Lot Area/Width; <br />LR-IB Lot Area Lot Width <br />Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acre)140’ <br />Actual 10,700 s.f (0.24 acre)70’ <br />Setbacks for the deck; <br />LR-IB Required Existing Proposed <br />Lake 75’70’70’ <br />NE Side 10’15’15’ <br />SW Side 10’43’43’
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.