My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
03-08-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:28:38 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 2:13:53 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
468
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br />Ik <br />EXHIBIT C2. <br />William L. Tniback <br />TO:Orono City Council Members: <br />2750 Kelley Parkway <br />Crystal Bay. MN 55323 <br />ATTN:Mr. Ron Moorse <br />Orono City Administrator <br />Ms. Janice Waateia <br />City Planner <br />DATE:January 2.2004 <br />RE:Proposed Development of Maxwell Bay Estates' <br />I am witttng on behalf of myself and my wife. Judith W. Trubeck, Mama W. Fullerton, and James <br />and Haify McNemey. Jr., owners of properties located at 3300 Fox Street. 3350 Fox Street and <br />3400 Pox Street respectively, all locaM on Maxwell Bay. Our property (3300 Fox Street) Is <br />immediately adiaoent to the proposed development known as Maxwell Bay Estates. <br />We strongly rflesapprove and are most oonoemed over the proposed development of 6 new <br />homesites on this property. Although we understand that the new owners. Bnjce and Kris <br />Paddock, along with George W. Sdci^. have received conditional approval of this plan from the <br />Orono Planning Commission, we iKxietheless raise the following additional. Important issues for <br />your consideration as you review the Applicant's request for subdivision approval. <br />These issues tochide, but are not HmKed to, the following: <br />1. Although we note that m eootoglcai study was performed by Svobada Ecological <br />Resources on September 8,2003, we beleve the study tails to address adequately other <br />ecological and environmental oonoems. For example, we are particularly concerned about <br />the proximity of septic Installations as dose as 76 feet from the lake. Alteration of the <br />erdsting grade and water run-off Issues potentially affecting properties on either side of the <br />proposed devetopment also need further review. <br />2. The plans we have seen do not address shoreline Issues. Many trees currently line the <br />shore and provide nesting for many native birds. The plan also makes .’to mention of the <br />b«»t docking provlsloos. or number of slips oonlampIMed. Will the proposal comply with <br />all LMCD and DNR regulaticns? <br />3. We oonour with the recommendation that the State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO) <br />inspect the site prior to any excavation or further work on the land. Based upon the history <br />of the area, and the unique features of the land, we believe a strong possibility exists that <br />ttie land may have been used by Dakota or Qjibwa Indians. In addition, we would like to <br />determine if any of the larKi indues "nativr prairie grasses* which should be preserved. <br />: <br />t! <br />■1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.