My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
02-09-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:27:59 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 12:32:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, January 20,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />of a S-bedroom mound system should the need arise to replace the existing system serving the <br />house and accessory building. However, the City Council has received and acted on a petition by <br />this neighborhood for municipal sewer, and it is anticipated that the property will be served by <br />municipal sewa in the relatively near future. <br />While the accessory building is conforming as to height, it is nonconfonrung as to size and <br />location. The structure consists of two buildings • an old stable and a newer garage, connected by a <br />circular room. The total square footage is approximately 1075 s.f., which would place this building <br />into die category of an ‘oversize accessory structure’ subject to principal structure setbacks (50' <br />front, 30' side) and not nearer the street than the principal residence structure. However, this <br />building is located approximately 49' from the cul-de-sac where a 50' setback would be required, <br />and it sits between the house and the street Further, its location ranges from 1.5' to 6' from the <br />north side lot line. <br />Gaffron indicated diat the building today is screened from the north by vegetation existing on the <br />adjacent property. Staff believes the neighborhood visual impact today is as minimal as it was in <br />1990. <br />Gaffron stated that it is assumed tlut the property owner will agree to the coveruuit requirements, <br />including: <br />- the building will not be used for a home occupation; <br />- the building will not be used as a dwelling; and <br />- building will not be rented, leased or otherwise provided for use as a dwelling. <br />In order to approve the CUP, Gaffron explained that the Council must make the following two <br />findings: <br />• the proposed use of the accessory structure with plumbing will not be detrimental to the <br />residential character of the neighborhood. <br />• the plumbmg fixtures proposed are in keq)ing with die intended use of the <br />PAGE 45 of 64 <br />li
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.