My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-2004 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2004
>
02-09-2004 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 10:27:59 AM
Creation date
1/19/2023 12:32:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE# 04-2967 <br />January 6. 2004 <br />P»ga3of 5 <br />RR-IB Required Existing Proposed <br />Front 50 ’50 ’No Change <br />Rear 50 ’50 ’50 ’ New Bam <br />West Side 30 ’94’No change <br />East Side 30 ’43’No change <br />structural Coverage; <br />Total Lot Area <br />86,968 sq ft (2.0 acre) <br />Total Structural Coverage <br />Allowed: 13,045 s.f. (15%) <br />Proposed: 3.972 s.f. (4.6 %) <br />Conditional Use Permit Review <br />The property is located at 2900 Watertown Road, with Watertown Road to the south and <br />Wear Circle to the north, and is a through lot. A conditional use permit is required to <br />construct any accessory structure on a through lot. The intent of the Zoning Ordinance is <br />to ensure that the project is reviewed to protect sight-lines from roadways and <br />neighboring properties. There are a number of mature trees to the rear of the property <br />which will assist in screening the bam from Wear Circle. <br />Oversized Accessory Structure Variance <br />To evaluate the visual impact of the proposed bant an on-site inspection was conducted <br />by staff which revealed tree and vegetation coverage. Staff finds that the maintenance of <br />large trees on site, the location for the proposed bam, along with the homeowner ’s desire <br />to re-use a portion of the old barn’s foundation would be supportive of the variance in <br />this case. Additionally, the new bam is proposed to be 1,116 s.f. less in area than the old <br />bam which was destroyed. The new bam is proposed to be 14* high, shorter than the 2- <br />story home on the property. The proposed bam will meet all required setbacks for the <br />RR-IB zoning district. The property is under the 15% lot coverage by stmeture limit by <br />approximately 9,000 s.f. (13,045 s.f. allowed, 3,972 s.f. proposed). <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicant has provided a hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br />additional testimony regarding the application. <br />J <br />k.L^ ir^a kJ. I»
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.