Laserfiche WebLink
'VC-.-'.- <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that ihe City Council of Orono. <br />Minnesota hereby denies the requested variances as described above based on one or <br />more of the following findings of fact concerning this property; <br />1. <br />3. <br />4. <br />The property consists of 0.47 acres, or 20,624 s.f. of land area which is <br />sufficient area to construct a reasonably sized home. <br />It is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to protect the <br />water quality of Lake Minnetonka by limiting the amount of hardcover a <br />lot contains. No hardship exists on this lot that would support a variance <br />to allow additional hardcover. <br />The granting of the requested variances would be contrary to the <br />provisions of Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-123, with which the <br />applicants must first comply in order that variances be granted. The <br />Council finds that: <br />a.The property in question can be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />the conditions allowed by the official controls if the proposed <br />variances were granted. <br />b. The plight of the landowner was created by the landowTier in the <br />design of home that was proposed. <br />c.Granting of the proposed variances would appear to serve as a <br />convenience to the applicants and the applicants have not <br />demonstrated a reasonable hardship or practical difficulty acceptable <br />to the City Council. <br />d. The conditions of the Zoning Code limits imposed and existing on this <br />property generally apply to all other land and structures in the zoning <br />district in which this property is located as well as in adjacent <br />residential zoning districts. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br />and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br />comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the <br />health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 3