Laserfiche WebLink
#2484 WoodhillCC <br />May 5,1999 <br />Page 16 <br />5. Does Council accept the Club's premise that the Club has access rights which should be <br />formally and permanently acknowledged? Does Council accept the Club's request that once <br />established formally, these access rights will not be subject to future review- except by <br />neighborhood petition per the zoning code? Given the large size of the Club property, <br />should some modifier be established so that factors other than "petition of 75% of all <br />property owners w-ithin 1000' of the property" would trigger a future CUP review? <br />6. Does Council agree that Club rights regarding the 1987 easement for Lot 3 and regarding <br />blockage or involuntary closure of theWoodhill Road access to 15, must be independent of <br />any CUP process or review? <br />7. Does Council agree with the 7 "triggers" proposed by Woodhill CC that will require further <br />City review or further amendment of the CUP? <br />8. Does Council agree with staff tliat this application does not and will not address the historical <br />ongoing country' club use, but merely deals w-ith this secondary access issue? <br />9. Should the Club be required to pave the portion of the driveway within the right-of-way of <br />Woodhill Avenue? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Council must weigh the needs and the rights of botli the Club and the neighborhood, against tlic <br />public health, safety and welfare concerns that surround this issue. <br />In the event that Council determines that some limited use of the access is appropriate, staff w ould <br />recommend, as a starting point, that the following minimum conditions be attached to such approval: <br />1 . If the Club's access to County Road 1 5 is closed for whatever reason for an extended period <br />other than a short term emergency situation, the City must have the right to reconsider the <br />Club's Woodhill Avenue access CUP to allow consideration of all alternatives for provision <br />of proper and adequate access for the Club and other potential access users, and consideration <br />of the impacts of those alternatives. <br />2. The City should establish triggers which will allow- review of the Woodhill Avenue access <br />CUP, including but not limited to: <br />- those proposed by the Club; <br />- a review based on the amount of actual traffic using the access; <br />a review after some given time period. <br />If Council concludes that approval of the access is appropriate. Council should direct staff to draft <br />a CUP approval resolution with appropriate findings and conditions, for consideration at the May <br />24 Council meeting.